24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

liguan525

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 9 (幼儿园)
金币: 915.2
帖子: 204
在线: 72.3小时
虫号: 866542

[交流] 每次写审稿意见都发愁，有没有虫友愿意分享自己的SCI论文审稿意见？

经常要给一些英文论文写审稿意见，农学，作物科学相关的，或者生物类的，希望虫友们友情分享一下自己的审稿意见，给我参考一下吧，英文的哦，非常感谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球已经有6人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有4人回复
求个博导看看已经有18人回复
自荐读博已经有6人回复
青基代表作，AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗？还是归为workshop之流？已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士已经有6人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有9人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-10-21 14:13:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

bachier

金虫 (职业作家)

应助: 294 (大学生)
贵宾: 0.08
金币: 834.8
帖子: 4719
在线: 1179.6小时
虫号: 394495

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

同一篇文章，接受的：
Reviewer: 1
>
>Recommendation: Publish as is in ACS Nano; no revisions needed.
>
>Comments:
>This is a very good and very interesting article that describes the selective deposition of Pt onto active sites on Au nanostructures to create novel cage structures. Not only does this approach to the synthesis of nanostructures strikes me as completely new, but further many of the structures they show can not be obtained in with any other method. Furthermore, the work is fairly complete and well-presented. I have only one very minor suggestion to make before publication: remove the work "technologies" from the abstract. Besides that this article seems ready for publication.
>
>Additional Questions:
>Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes
>
>If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field:
>
>Is it appealing to a broad audience?: Yes
>
>Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes
>
>Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>
>Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
>
>Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes
>
>Significance: High
>
>Novelty: Top 5%
>
>Broad interest: High
>
>Scholarly presentation: Top 5%
>
>
>Reviewer: 2
>
>Recommendation: Publish in ACS Nano after minor revisions noted.
>
>Comments:
>This paper reports the preparation of Pt frame structures by the selective deposition of Pt on the edges of Au particles of octahedron or decahedron. The results are of interest from both scientific and technological points of view. Especially novel structures of Pt nanorings were formed with a high yield. Therefore, I recommend this paper to be published after the following minor revision.
>
>1. Authors should comment the dependence of the yield of Pt nanostructures on the ratio of Pt/Au used in the preparation. Could the width of frames be controlled by adjusting the amount of PtCl6- added?
>2. Why could Pt particles be selectively deposited on the peripheral of decahedral Au particles (Fig. 2)? The edges of decahedral Au particles seem to have same chemical potentials.
>3. Some of octahedral frame structures seem not to be composed of frames (Fig. 5D). Probably Au(111) facets were covered with thin Pt layers, resulting in the hollow octahedral Pt particles.
>
>Additional Questions:
>Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes
>
>If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field:
>
>Is it appealing to a broad audience?: Yes
>
>Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: No
>
>Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>
>Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
>
>Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes
>
>Significance: High
>
>Novelty: Moderate
>
>Broad interest: High
>
>Scholarly presentation: High
>
>
>Reviewer: 3
>
>Recommendation: Publish in ACS Nano after minor revisions noted.
>
>Comments:
>The manuscript entitled “Selective Etching Induces Selective Growth and Controlled Formation of Various Pt Nanostructures by Modifying Seed Surface Free Energy” describes the inhomogeneous seeded growth of Pt nanocages by selectively etching the high-energy edges of Au nanostructures, which then act as nucleation sites for Pt growth. Although metal cage-like structures are not new, the authors present a convincing mechanistic description of the etching process followed by the selective growth of Pt. Some general comments are listed below.
>
>On page 4, line 48 the authors suggest that “From Figure 2 B1, only the edges intersected by {111} and {100} facets were etched. However, the edges intersected by {111} facets have no distinct change.” From the TEM images looking down on the {111} faces, though, it is very difficult to determine if any etching occurred. Does an extended etching process in the absence of H2PtCl4 show etching along these intersecting planes? What is the difference in etch rate expected for the different edges/facets vs. twinning planes?
>
>On page 14, line 17 the authors discuss the etching/overgrowth process on a minority of Au particles present in the samples of decahedra that are different shapes (triangular and hexagonal plates as well as nanorods). However, the plates as well as the octahedra and decahedra described in the majority of the study are bounded by {111} planes, and there is little information on the etching process of the nanorods which include {110} and {100} planes that are not located at edges. The authors allude to future studies on different types of particles, but it might be helpful to expand the discussion in this manuscript to include Au particles bounded by {100} facets such as cubes. Also, has the selective etching/overgrowth process been tried with other metals, both as templates and overgrowth metals? This information would be nice to support the generalization of the process.
>
>Does the amount of KI and temperature affect the etch rate or the mechanism of etching?
>
>Additionally, the manuscript should be edited for grammar, typos, and English usage.
>
>
>Additional Questions:
>Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: Yes
>
>If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field:
>
>Is it appealing to a broad audience?: Yes
>
>Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes
>
>Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>
>Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
>
>Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: No
>
>Significance: High
>
>Novelty: High
>
>Broad interest: High
>
>Scholarly presentation: Moderate
>
>
>Reviewer: 4
>
>Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions noted.
>
>Comments:
>This manuscript by N. Fan et al. describes an etching-based approach by which hollow ring-/cage-ike Pt nanocrystals can be generated starting from highly faceted Au seeds in an appropriate colloidal environment containing KI and a platinum salt precursor. The obtained nanostructures are certainly intriguing; however I am not completely sure that they are totally unprecedented (the authors should address this concern by putting appropriate emphasis in the introductory section). The proposed growth mechanism seems to be plausible, even though not all conclusions drawn can be accepted beyond any doubt. For example, the control experiments carried out by the authors do not allow one to unambiguously exclude that the PVP capping agent may play a role in assisting selective seed etching. In addition, another mechanistic picture that may be compatible with the formation of I2 (which the authors regard as the true etchant in the system) upon iodine oxidation would initially involve preferential displacement of the capping ligands from selected surfaces sites of the Au seeds, as suggested in the recent literature. Thus, the authors should reconsider certain mechanistic arguments, using them with caution. Finally, I recommend that the authors refine the use of certain terms/notations in their descriptions and arguments (e.g., seeding growth vs. seeded growth; homogeneous/inhomogeneous seeding, homogeneous/heterogeneous nucleation, etc.) taking a closer look at ref. 24 as a reference for the appropriate classification of growth mechanisms, hybrid nanocrystal structures and related subjects.
>English usage should be polished before publication may proceed.
>
>
>Additional Questions:
>Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No
>
>If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: It could be improved to be in the top 15% with appropriate revisions.
>
>Is it appealing to a broad audience?: Yes
>
>Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes
>
>Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>
>Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
>
>Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes
>
>Significance: High
>
>Novelty: Moderate
>
>Broad interest: High
>
>Scholarly presentation: Moderate