| 查看: 5579 | 回复: 60 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
AM修改重投的几率大么？
|
|||
|
6月中旬投的AM，一审100天，终于回了修改意见，两个审稿人一个是小修接收，一个是据稿（可以大修接收）。 Reviewer # 1 IMPORTANCE: 2. Highly important (top 15%) DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Yes APPROPRIATE LENGTH: No, the manuscript is too long OTHER JOURNAL: RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE: 3. Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions Reviewer # 2 IMPORTANCE: 2. Highly important (top 15%) DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Yes APPROPRIATE LENGTH: No, the manuscript is too long OTHER JOURNAL: RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE: 2. Acceptable after minor revisions 编辑给了重投，不知道这样修改后重投中的几率有多大？ Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ADVANCED MATERIALS. The reviewer comments are attached below. Besides the comments, the length of your manuscript also exceeds the limit for communication. I suggest that you keep the length of revised version within 4500 words (including references and figure captions) and 4 figures, otherwise you may also consider publishing it in Advanced Functional Materials. Unfortunately, on the basis of the reviewer comments, we are not able at this stage to accept it for publication. However, if you are able to address the reviewer comments and make the necessary revisions and improvements we would be happy to receive the manuscript as a new submission in the future. This would involve uploading a new manuscript to http://www.materialsviews.com/submissions/, mentioning this correspondence in your cover letter and including a detailed list of revisions along with your response to the reviewer comments. Please insert "REVISION:" before the manuscript title in the manuscript title field on www.manuscriptXpress.com (but not in the manuscript Word document or PDF) to speed handling. I regret that we are unable to provide a more positive outcome at this stage, but I hope the reviewer comments will be helpful to you in revising and resubmitting your manuscript to Advanced Materials or to another journal. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Optics Letter 返回审稿意见，请大家支招，如何处理？多谢！
已经有14人回复
- l两个大修，编辑拒稿，是否可重投该杂志？
已经有11人回复
- JPC据稿，大家帮忙看看意见，如果适当修改可以再投哪些期刊？
已经有80人回复
- 请问这样的审稿意见修改后录用的几率大吗
已经有5人回复
- 两个审稿人让大修，请教主编据稿后让修改后重投的问题
已经有28人回复
- 被EA拒了 说是可以修改重投 但是感觉不放心
已经有35人回复
- 投稿Carbon初审被主编连拒两次，说改后重投，这是老外的客套话吗
已经有34人回复
- 收到lab on a chip的拒信，可否重投
已经有14人回复
- chief editor这样说了 还有必要修改重投吗？~
已经有13人回复
- RSC和ACS的审稿意见结果什么的是共享的吗？？被拒后重投有什么经验？？
已经有10人回复
- 关于论文修改后重投
已经有18人回复
- 第一次投稿被拒了，大家帮我看看还有没有希望修改后重投。谢谢！！！！！
已经有10人回复
- 文章要修改，却没修改意见，咋整？
已经有21人回复
- Angew.Chem.Int.Ed 被据，编辑审稿人一致建议改投姐妹杂志，接收的几率多大？
已经有34人回复
- 请教《物理学报》修改后再审的录用几率？
已经有16人回复
- 被拒了，准备改投，请教一下~~
已经有33人回复
10楼2013-09-27 00:06:04
3楼2013-09-26 23:37:13
5楼2013-09-26 23:38:52
7楼2013-09-26 23:53:37
