24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

weizhe34

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 22062.9
帖子: 3866
在线: 921.6小时
虫号: 432244

[交流] 小硕第一篇SCI遇到的苦逼事情，请大家分析帮助！

刚刚收到的编辑的来信，今年Jul 29, 2013递交，之前都是under review Sep 17, 2013更新说Reject
审稿意见为：
I regret to inform you that on the basis of the reports and comments received
from the referees we are unable to accept the above-mentioned manuscript for
publication in Process Biochemistry in its present form.

The comments of the referees are enclosed for your consideration. We hope the information provided by the referees is helpful to you. However, as suggested by the referees, we would like to encourage you to prepare a new version of your manuscript and to resubmit this to the Journal if you have made a thorough revision and you are confident in convincing the referees. But for that you must do the additional experimental work asked by the reviewers. If this is not done, it is not useful to resubmit : your manuscript will be rejected.

If or when you resubmit please have a detailed list (point to point) of your responses to each item of the review comments, and highlight your revised text in red in the new version of your manuscript.

When you do so, please enter the original Manuscript ID in the appropriate field in the manuscript details page.

Reviewers' comments:

Editor : 加几篇近五年的文章

Reviewer #1:主要提了一些小问题建议为I think that this paper could be published in Process Biochemistry after a major revision.

第二个Reviewer #2:可能不是该领域的提的几个问题不是很准确，其他也是文章图标写法不够准确什么的，他的结论是For all the reasons above mentioned, in my opinion, this manuscript is not suitable for publication at this stage in Process Biochemistry.

这样的情况不知道虫友有没有遇到过，不知道接下来如何处理，希望大家帮助我分析下，给点建议，谢谢！

回复此楼