24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4180)
>导师招生 (208)
>博后之家 (208)
>论文投稿 (197)
>文献求助 (174)
>虫友互识 (152)
>有机交流 (80)
>硕博家园 (76)
>考博 (59)
>招聘信息布告栏 (43)
>学术会议 (29)
>休闲灌水 (27)
>找工作 (17)
>基金申请 (16)
>考研 (14)
>教师之家 (11)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

brbrm

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 32 (小学生)
金币: 6409.8
帖子: 1296
在线: 348.8小时
虫号: 1194911

[交流] Soft Computing论文发表，还愿散金币

一篇投Soft Computing的论文，7.19状态为Required Review Completed，一直到9.10才变为Decision in Process，在此祈福！如有好消息继续追加金币！

补充：收到结果了，大修。两个审稿意见，差别较大，看来这是Decision in Process时间如此之长的主要原因。一个同意直接接受，另一个给出了如下大修意见：

1. The contribution of this study does not show explicitly and semms not clear. Few is there regarding how and what be taken using the proposed approach.
2. The paper wastes too many pages. This paper should be written briefly and concisely without losing its meaning. This study is also not well organized.
3. And, the conclusions is too short and vague.
In short I find it difficult to believe that this manuscript really provides useful formulation to make a very meaningful contribution.
Based on the above comments, I recommend that the paper should be major revision.

郁闷的是，两份审稿意见都是泛泛的评价，几乎没有看到对论文技术内容的实质性意见。
追加点金币，求高手指点，针对第二份审稿意见如何修改为好？改后接受可能性多大？他第二点说我论文太长，但那主要都是实验数据和分析，是支撑论文的关键材料。

[ Last edited by brbrm on 2013-9-15 at 08:44 ]

9月发的帖子“Soft Computing论文Decision in Process，祈福”。经过修回后终于录用，还愿散金币

[ Last edited by brbrm on 2013-12-28 at 18:48 ]

回复此楼