| 查看: 616 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价3次,作者学员2bQ2PZ增加金币 1.5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[资源]
【分享】Hazardous Substances and Human Health, Volume 8【搜索无重复】
|
||
|
Hazardous Substances and Human Health, Volume 8: Exposure, Impact and External Cost Assessment at the European Scale (Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment) By T.M. Bachmann * Publisher: Elsevier Science * Number Of Pages: 612 * Publication Date: 2006-03-02 * ISBN-10 / ASIN: 0444522182 * ISBN-13 / EAN: 9780444522184 * Binding: Hardcover Book Description: There is widespread public concern about hazardous chemicals that are contained in air, soil, water and food. Policy has therefore adopted a series of laws and regulations concerning emissions into and concentration levels in different media including food. As policy makers do not only have to consider the protection of the environment but also need to ensure a well-functioning economy at the same time, these limit or target values need to be set in a balanced way. The main problem, however, is to compare the costs for achieving these targets with the benefits to society by having a smaller exposure to hazardous substances (cost-benefit analysis). This book sets out to improve the reliability of cost-benefit analyses particularly of hazardous substances present in air, water, soil and food. It suggests that the human health risk assessment of chemicals is performed in a bottom-up analysis, i.e., following a spatially resolved multimedia modelling approach. In order to support cost-benefit analyses, the approach is accompanied by monetary valuation of human health impacts, yielding so-called external costs. Results for selected priority metals show that these external costs are small compared to those by the classical air pollutants and involve rather long time horizons touching on the aspect of intergenerational equity within sustainable development. When including further hazardous substances, the total external costs attributable to contaminants are expected to be more substantial. [ Last edited by wbaishi on 2008-11-27 at 17:01 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
祈福,祝自己今年好运
已经有100人回复
关于会评
已经有1人回复
地质学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有294人回复
据说!出现这些情况,国基金会评本子会被拿下!
已经有19人回复
无人打捞,直接陪跑
已经有16人回复
定了定了,明天出结果!2025 国自然基金结果即将揭晓,查询攻略看这里
已经有107人回复
2025国家自然科学基金放榜时间,根据官方回应,8月15日基本没戏了
已经有5人回复
无法从这份源码判断项目是否“获资助批准”
已经有11人回复
各位未来院士帮忙看看评审意见
已经有9人回复
《风吹过日常的缝隙》
已经有0人回复
4楼2007-12-08 14:19:31
2楼2007-11-27 12:27:11
3楼2007-12-08 12:26:29











回复此楼
