| ²é¿´: 558 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
flying20080401ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
³¬¼¶Ç±Ë®Ô±
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÊìϤXPSµÄÇëÖ¸½Ì£¡
|
|
|
ÊÕµ½Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬¹ØÓÚXPS²âÊԵġ£Òâ¼ûÈçÏ£º 1.To my judgement Fig3 does not show actual XPS data. The peaks have no reminiscence of Loerentzian or Doniach Sunjic lines. The typical Shirley background is missing and the noise level is below the resolution of the Figures. Please make sure to show original data along with the fitted functions, but I cannot really judge without knowing the original spectra. 2.Specifically related to the XPS analysis, the C1s energies were corrected to one fix value. Note that this has no physical meaning as shifts or broadenings of the peaks can naturally occur due to the oxidation of the graphene layers. Why did they do a Gaussian fit? Other functions can describe the system much better. ÎÒµÄÇúÏßÄâºÏÓõÄÊÇpeakfit¡£¿´²»¶®Òâ¼û£¬ÓÈÆäÊÇLoerentzian or Doniach Sunjic lines¡£ÇëÖ¸½Ì£¡Ð»Ð»£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼ÁԺУÐÅÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤306
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶551£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ070300 ѧ˶336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
286·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜרҵÇëÇóµ÷¼ÁÔ¸Òâ¿ç¿¼£¡
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³ µ÷¼ÁÉêÇë(333·Ö)
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
280Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
269ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧ˶301·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
´ß»¯¼ÁÖÐ×é·ÖµÄ¼ì²â
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ÇâÆ×µÄË«¶þÖØ·å
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
XRFµÄ±¨¸æÈçºÎÀí½â£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Î÷°²»ò±±¾©µØÇø×ö²ÄÁϼӹ¤¡¢²âÊÔÓë·ÖÎöµÄµØ·½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÔÚexcelÀï´¦ÀíÒ»ÏÂÊý¾ÝÇó΢·Ö£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸½ÌÒ»ÏÂ~ллÀ²~
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¡¾½»Á÷¡¿¹ØÓÚXRFÓëXRDµÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÇóÖúÑõ»¯¹µÉè¼Æ·½ÃæµÄÐèÑõÁ¿¼ÆËãÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿vasp Ô´´úÂëÔõôѧϰ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÁòµÄXPS±íÕ÷ÖеÄË«ÖØ·ÖÁÑ·åµÄÎÊÌ⣬ÇëÖ¸½Ì£¡
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´

flying20080401
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
³¬¼¶Ç±Ë®Ô±
- Ó¦Öú: 25 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 25706.1
- É¢½ð: 69
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2657
- ÔÚÏß: 480.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 242958
- ×¢²á: 2006-04-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¦ÄÜÌÕ´É

4Â¥2013-08-21 17:10:02













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10