×î½üͶIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research£¬±à¼×òÌì¸øµÄ»Ø¸´ÈçÏ£¬ÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶ºóÎÒµÄÏ£ÍûÓжà´ó£¿
ÓÉÓÚÊÇ×ö»¯¹¤»ù´¡µÄ£¬ËùÒÔ²ÅͶÕâ¸öÆÚ¿¯²¢Çҷdz£Ï£ÍûÄܹ»ÖС£
¡°Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are attached. The reviewers see value in the work, but they have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don¡¯t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that includes such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers¡¯ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns. Please note that both reviewers mention that the English usage needs to improve significantly.
To revise your manuscript, log into ACS Paragon Plus at http://paragonplus.acs.org/login and select "......»¹Óм¸¶ÎÖØÍ¶µÄ×¢ÒâÊÂÏî
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
The data are interesting for those working on XXX but the analysis is too superficial.
1,2,3£¬-13ÌõÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û¡£
1. It is a very interesting paper on XXX. Authors systematically analyzed the potential of XXX.
2. The organization of sentences is very confusing. It must be thoroughly revised
to consider this paper for publication.
3-18ÌõÒâ¼û£¬ÆäÖÐ7Ìõ¾ä×ÓÊôÓÚÐ޸ġ£ |