| 查看: 2453 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
编辑如是回复，还有必要修改再投该刊吗？
|
||
|
Thank you for choosing to submit your article for consideration for publication in Analyst. After careful evaluation of the manuscript and referee reports, I regret to inform you that we do not find your current manuscript suitable for publication in this journal. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports. However, we would like to encourage you to fully address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to Analyst. It should be noted though that any overlap with previously published papers has to be avoided. Hence, please pay particular attention to the serious concerns of Rev. 1, which I personally share. Unless substantially different data is communicated, I suggest you abstain from a resubmission. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached. You can resubmit your manuscript through your Author Centre at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/an . Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript. Alternatively, follow the link below to create your resubmission: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/an?URL_MASK=MFRBS64tHyCNH9XhrdZt Please note that the deep link in this email is generated for the convenience of our customers. The link goes straight to the user’s account without the need to log on to the system, therefore, for your account security, you should not share this link with others. I look forward to a resubmission. Your sincerely, Professor Boris Mizaikoff Associate Editor for Europe University of Ulm, Germany analyst@rsc.org |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有8人回复
-
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
-
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有19人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有17人回复
-
fileCode有新解读？
已经有18人回复
-
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 第一篇SCI被拒，纠结要不要重投，大家帮忙看看
已经有26人回复
- SCI论文从入门到精通（第一版）
已经有93人回复
3楼2013-07-24 21:49:49
2楼2013-07-24 21:45:31
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
4楼2013-07-24 22:37:46
5楼2013-07-24 22:58:26
