[交流] 第一次投稿major revision 望各位指导下接收的可能性 已有12人参与

本人小菜鸟一枚，第一次投论文，期刊《Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures》。现投稿一个月初审回来。编辑要求major revision现给出三个reviewers的意见，希望大家能指点一下接收的可能性有多大。 Dear Dr. Li: Manuscript ID FFEMS-5326 entitled "****" which you submitted to FFEMS has been reviewed.  The comments of the expert reviewers are included at the bottom of this letter. The review result of your manuscript is Major Revision and I would like to invite you to revise the manuscript following the recommendations of the reviewers. Please respond to all of the comments made by the reviewers by amending the manuscript and if necessary, making separate comments. In the submission of your revised manuscript, please detail your responses as a separate document. Your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible as we are trying to provide rapid publication of manuscripts submitted to FFEMS.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revised manuscript within two months, please let us know immediately. Once again, thank you for submitting your work to FFEMS and I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Reviewer1 没有给出多少意见只是叫我和其它模型作对比。并解释一下我的模型参数的物理意义。 Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The authors proposed a multiaxial fatigue damage model based on the critical plane approach to predict the life for low-cycle fatigue. However, the paper undergoes the clarification of some problems. I would suggest the authors improve or rewrite the paper because the reviewer thinks that the paper confuses some of the concepts, and the lack of detailed description of the experimental data. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author 没说什么，叫我把数据处理一下并引用该期刊的论文。 请问各位牛人这种情况下接收的概率有多大啊~~~~~~

回复此楼