24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2079)
>虫友互识 (121)
>导师招生 (88)
>招聘信息布告栏 (31)
>硕博家园 (22)
>考博 (21)
>公派出国 (21)
>博后之家 (19)
>考研 (14)
>休闲灌水 (13)
>文献求助 (12)
>论文道贺祈福 (11)
>找工作 (11)
>药学 (11)
>教师之家 (10)
>论文投稿 (10)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

superdr

金虫 (著名写手)

应助: 24 (小学生)
金币: 1336.8
帖子: 1065
在线: 159.8小时
虫号: 497225

[交流] JACS和Nature Commun.哪个更好？

化学的论文投JACS还是Nature Commun.？
能够在哪个上面发表更好？JACS是不是在化学方面更被认可？Nature Commun是个综合类的，什么内容都有，不知道与JACS相比如何（仅对化学的paper）。

回复此楼

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴

1楼2013-06-19 20:23:32

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

liangji

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 49.5
帖子: 1024
在线: 195.5小时
虫号: 205901

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

把期刊另一部分介绍补充完全难道是我理解力不行?
明显指出其他nature journal被拒的有很大可能转给NC，而我也了解现实中有人确实有如此遭遇，投NC不中的可以转给scientific reports
给nature投过稿件的也知道投nature及其子刊与NC或SR是不一起的

Relationship to other Nature journals

Nature Communications is editorially independent, and its editors will make their own decisions independently of the other Nature journals. It is for authors alone to decide where to submit their manuscripts. Nature will continue to publish the most significant advances in science and the Nature research journals will publish landmark papers of interest to their specific communities. Nature Communications will publish high-quality papers from all areas of science that represent important advances within specific scientific disciplines, but that might not necessarily have the scientific reach of papers published in Nature and the Nature research journals. For papers that could satisfy the scope of more than one Nature journal, the choice of which journal to submit to first lies with the authors.

If a paper is rejected from one Nature journal, the authors can use an automated manuscript transfer service to submit the paper to Nature Communications via a link sent to them by the editor handling the manuscript. Authors should note that referees' comments (including any confidential comments to the editor) and identities are transferred to the editor of the second journal along with the manuscript. The journal editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases the editors may choose to take advice from additional referees. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. For more information, please consult the following:

[ Last edited by liangji on 2013-6-21 at 04:45 ]