24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1625  |  回复: 10

cfx2002

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


[交流] 有的杂志为什么连审都没审,就退稿呢

小弟四天前投了一个SCI。结果今天就被拒了,问题是理由很郁闷。稿子太多。内容如下
Dear Professor ****,

I regret to inform you that we are returning your paper

Paper Ref. No.: 332/13 (2016)
Author: **************************
Title: ****************************
which you submitted for publication in the Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal.
The Editorial Board is currently receiving many more papers than
it is able to publish, and is therefore returning, after careful consideration,
a number of them unrefereed. I hope you will not let this experience
deter you from sending us your best work in future.

Sincerely yours,
Miroslav Englis
Editor-in-Chief of Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
还有谁遇到这种情形。对方是真的看了论文不行,。还是真的因为稿子多拒稿啊
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

982121012

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



cfx2002(金币+1): 谢谢参与
就是你的文章写得太烂了。编辑不感兴趣。
6楼2013-06-13 08:29:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

cfx2002(金币+1): 谢谢参与
很多的,可能是对你的稿子没有兴趣。
2楼2013-06-13 08:03:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cfx2002(金币+1): 谢谢参与
可能因为类似的稿件太多,因为这个原因拒稿的情形不少见
3楼2013-06-13 08:17:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yao.icc

铜虫 (小有名气)



cfx2002(金币+1): 谢谢参与
我的前天刚被拒,也是类似情况。应该是因为接稿量很大,为了减轻审稿人工作量,主编就自行筛选一批。文章有吸引力才是王道啊!悲痛中...

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
5楼2013-06-13 08:28:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ihblw

木虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
稿子投稿到编辑部,必须经过编辑初审,一般有30%以上的文章被拒,不被送审。
7楼2013-06-13 08:36:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Halmos

铁虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
It happens.

I received a review invitation from a journal, the body of message looks like this..

Dear XX (, I do not want to tell my name),

JOT2305
Dinh Trung Hoa and Hiroyuki Osaka
Interpolation classes and inequalities

I have received this paper for consideration by JOT.
We have a serious backlog, and wish to do a serious review
only of strong papers.  I would appreciate it if you would
take a quick look at this paper and decide if you feel it
deserves a thorough review.  If in your opinion, this paper
does not have significant merit, then please return it quickly
with a negative opinion.

On the other hand, if this appears likely to be a strong paper,
then I would appreciate a more serious review.  Then explicit
suggestions to the author would be very helpful.  It is important
that papers be strictly refereed, as we receive many papers and
wish to maintain a very high standard.

We are trying to maintain a quick turn-around for our submissions.
I would appreciate a report within three months.
.....
10楼2013-06-20 05:12:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

makunjida

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
有时候主编就能自己判断,有时候他找人看一眼,主要是内容和主题。主题不是特别符合的直接退稿。顶级期刊一般不会说客套话,原因会告诉你

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
11楼2013-06-20 08:54:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2013-06-13 08:27   回复  
cfx2002(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-06-13 09:18   回复  
nuaawq9楼
2013-06-13 17:06   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cfx2002 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见