| ²é¿´: 2202 | »Ø¸´: 22 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
[½»Á÷]
ʹÓÃØÍÊÆ»ù×é¾Í²»ÄܼÆËãHOMO-LUMO gap Â𣿣¿
|
|||
|
ÓÉÓÚ¼ÆËã×ÊÔ´ÎÊÌ⣬ÎÒ¼ÆËãʱ¶ÔÒøÔ×ÓʹÓÃÁËLanl2Tz»ù×é¡£²¢ÇÒÌÖÂÛÁËHOMO-LUMO gap. Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º I doubt, that the HOMO-LUMO gaps can be tell much about the stability, especially the open shell cases can have significant multi-reference character, which can be not determined with the DFT calculation. From figure 3 I get the impression that they used unrestricted DFT, can they please provide the spin expectation value to judge the quality of these calculations. What do the authors mean with effective core potential for the HOMO-LUMO gap. ²»Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈËÒâ˼£¿Çë´ó¼ÒÖ¸µã£¬²»Ê¤¸Ð¼¤£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
΢ÄÉhub£¬Î¢Äɼӹ¤µÄ±¦¿â
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ñо¿ÉúѧÊõÐÂÈñ½±£üÄþ²¨Î¢ÄɲÄÁÏÑÐÌÖ»á²Î»á֪ͨ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ66È˻ظ´
ÉêÇë2027Äê²ÄÁÏ/»¯Ñ§À಩ʿ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
΢Äɼӹ¤ÀïµÄ lift-off ¹¤ÒÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
°Ä´óÀûÑÇÄÏÀ¥Ê¿À¼´óѧÁ¿×Óµã¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóÏà¹ØºÏ³ÉÌõ¼þ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
2027´º¼¾É격×Ô¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ïã¸ÛÖÐÎÄ´óѧ£¨ÉîÛÚ£©2026ÄêÕÐÆ¸¹«¸æ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çà»ùµÄ²ÄÁÏÇཷÃÇ£¬¿ÉÒÔ°Ñ˶ʿÁªÅàÉúËÍÎÒÕâÀҪÑжþÄÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ63È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
HOMO-LUMOÈ·¶¨gapµÄÎÊÌ⣬ÍûµÃµ½½â´ð£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊHOMO-LUMO gapÓëÎüÊÕ¹âÆ×µÄ¹ØÏµ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚHOMO-LUMO gapµÄÒÉÎÊ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
¿ª¿Ç²ãµÄHOMO-LUMO gap µ½µ×ÊÇÄÄÁ½¸öÏà¼õ°¡£¿Çó¸ßÊÖÖ¸µã
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú¹ØÓÚHOMO-LUMO Gap µÄÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿HOMO£¨×î¸ßÒÑÕ¼¹ìµÀ£©¡¢LUMO£¨×îµÍδռ¾Ý¹ìµÀ£©ºÍEnergy gap£¬·Ç³£¸Ðл£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¹ØÓÚHOMO£¨×î¸ßÒÑÕ¼¹ìµÀ£©ºÍLUMO£¨×îµÍδռ¾Ý¹ìµÀ£©ºÍEnergy gap£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¹²éîÌåϵ homo-lumo gap
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
4Â¥2013-06-11 14:28:44
2Â¥2013-06-10 23:18:08
3Â¥2013-06-11 14:16:31
8Â¥2013-06-11 17:15:26









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ŬÁ¦£¬ÔÙŬÁ¦£¡ÔÙ´´¼Ñ¼¨£¡
20