24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

love枫叶

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 238.3
红花: 1
帖子: 26
在线: 32.3小时
虫号: 1408925
注册: 2011-09-20
专业: 金属材料的微观结构

[求助] 审稿人只给了一些不痛不痒的回复，到底是神马意思啊？

Reviewers' comments:
Caption of Fig.1 should given more details about a-1,b-1,c-1,d-1.
In the caption of figure6, 2000degree should be 200degree.
The highlights should be clearly indicated the achievement in present paper, other than process description.
In abstract, the improvement of yield strength of sample after 60degree annealing is attributed to the increase of grain boundaries, and to the activation of nucleation of dislocation in grain boundaries in conclusion part. Table 2 illustrates that the average grain size is about 300*800,600*900 for as-Mac and sample after 60degree annealing. therefore, the quantity of grain boundaries and the dislocation density of sample after 60degree and 200degree should be given in table 2
审稿人只给了这些回复，也没有总体的文章评价。是不是就是强制修改啊，编辑给的是revise。这个再投回去还是给原审稿人吗？

回复此楼