应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 科研生活区 » English Cafe » Opinion » What are the differences between present professors and those before 1970s?
51/1返回列表
查看: 1480  |  回复: 20
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tuqin2575

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

专家

[交流] What are the differences between present professors and those before 1970s?

In the May Day holiday I bought a book named "Scholars in my contemporaries" by Ji Xianlin （我们这一代读书人）. It was soon possessed by my uncle, an aged editor, and read in advance. In exchange he present me another book, Fates of free intellectuals in China, one book concerns about the deeds and fates of learners, professors like Feng Youlan, Hu Shi, Wu Han, Qian Zhongshu and many other names I'm not so familiar before and in the "Great Cultural Revolution". I do not wanna talk about too much details in it. There is a view, "In those days the scholars or professors were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased..." Do you agree with that? And what do you think are the differences between them, present professors and those before 1970s?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
Befreeinyourway,justliketheshinninglighteveryday.
1楼 2013-05-26 12:56:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

00waterh

木虫 (知名作家)
those days， most are poor professors；rich now

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

[ Last edited by 00waterh on 2013-5-26 at 18:32 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2013-05-26 18:17:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 21 个回答

wry3300
★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳，给个红包
e

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2013-05-26 12:58:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

winter_north

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
May2012: 金币+5, dear brother....did you stay up late or get up early......:shuai::shuai::shuai: 2013-05-26 14:39:47
No. 1, the old scholars can not use computer, I am sure of that, but most of the contemporary ones can.

No. 2, the old ones must fly less than most of their contemporary counterparts.

No. 3, so, how should we define the word scholar? Does it mean a person who studies and write words? If that is true, perhaps contemporary scholars study more subjects.

Who are contemporary scholars in your opinion?

Did any names appear in your heart?

Yuan Longping, Rao Yi, Fang Zhouzi, are the names I can remember.
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2013-05-26 14:12:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nwsuafliu

木虫 (著名写手)
you've raised an interesting topic here. As those scholars in the book was mainly the big names from humanities or social sciences, the comparison is better restricted within the same or  related fields.

People may also say that " In those days the graduates were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased ...". Some people even argue that the bachelors today are only on the level of high school graduates 30 years ago.

personally, i do not think scholars before 1970s had higher academic level, better academic training or greater academic achievements than those of today. One should not ignore the word " valuable". There were so few scholars that many of them could be "visible" or provided with favorable positions. take a look on today's university or institutions, scholars are facing much harder competition and often distracted from their own study. I would say, "less is more" happened in those days, and is replaced by "more is less" today. it not matters how qualified they are, it matters in which time they were living.
赞一下 回复此楼
知识改变命运
6楼2013-05-26 20:54:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 21 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭