| 查看: 1243 | 回复: 20 | |||
tuqin2575铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
专家
|
[交流]
What are the differences between present professors and those before 1970s?
|
| In the May Day holiday I bought a book named "Scholars in my contemporaries" by Ji Xianlin (我们这一代读书人). It was soon possessed by my uncle, an aged editor, and read in advance. In exchange he present me another book, Fates of free intellectuals in China, one book concerns about the deeds and fates of learners, professors like Feng Youlan, Hu Shi, Wu Han, Qian Zhongshu and many other names I'm not so familiar before and in the "Great Cultural Revolution". I do not wanna talk about too much details in it. There is a view, "In those days the scholars or professors were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased..." Do you agree with that? And what do you think are the differences between them, present professors and those before 1970s? |
» 猜你喜欢
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层,如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有6人回复
今年春晚有几个节目很不错,点赞!
已经有10人回复
情人节自我反思:在爱情中有过遗憾吗?
已经有10人回复
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复

★
小木虫: 沙发+1,金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发,再给个红包
小木虫: 沙发+1,金币+0.5, 恭喜抢个沙发,再给个红包
| 1 |
2楼2013-05-26 12:58:15
★
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳,给个红包
小木虫: 金币+0.2, 抢了个小板凳,给个红包
|
e [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
3楼2013-05-26 12:58:23
winter_north
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 113
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.321
- 金币: 5614.5
- 散金: 1975
- 红花: 45
- 沙发: 21
- 帖子: 4840
- 在线: 929.3小时
- 虫号: 1567257
- 注册: 2012-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染控制化学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
May2012: 金币+5, dear brother....did you stay up late or get up early......:shuai::shuai::shuai: 2013-05-26 14:39:47
May2012: 金币+5, dear brother....did you stay up late or get up early......:shuai::shuai::shuai: 2013-05-26 14:39:47
|
No. 1, the old scholars can not use computer, I am sure of that, but most of the contemporary ones can. No. 2, the old ones must fly less than most of their contemporary counterparts. No. 3, so, how should we define the word scholar? Does it mean a person who studies and write words? If that is true, perhaps contemporary scholars study more subjects. Who are contemporary scholars in your opinion? Did any names appear in your heart? Yuan Longping, Rao Yi, Fang Zhouzi, are the names I can remember. |
4楼2013-05-26 14:12:31
00waterh
木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 36
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.936
- 金币: 4731.7
- 散金: 9439
- 红花: 81
- 沙发: 42
- 帖子: 6185
- 在线: 939.2小时
- 虫号: 2129944
- 注册: 2012-11-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 神经科学、认知科学与心理
those days, most are poor professors;rich now![]() [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2013-5-26 at 18:32 ] |
5楼2013-05-26 18:17:28
nwsuafliu
木虫 (著名写手)
- ESEPI: 3
- 应助: 42 (小学生)
- 金币: 2451.9
- 散金: 1449
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 1435
- 在线: 315.5小时
- 虫号: 136928
- 注册: 2005-12-17
- 专业: 作物分子育种
|
you've raised an interesting topic here. As those scholars in the book was mainly the big names from humanities or social sciences, the comparison is better restricted within the same or related fields. People may also say that " In those days the graduates were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased ...". Some people even argue that the bachelors today are only on the level of high school graduates 30 years ago. personally, i do not think scholars before 1970s had higher academic level, better academic training or greater academic achievements than those of today. One should not ignore the word " valuable". There were so few scholars that many of them could be "visible" or provided with favorable positions. take a look on today's university or institutions, scholars are facing much harder competition and often distracted from their own study. I would say, "less is more" happened in those days, and is replaced by "more is less" today. it not matters how qualified they are, it matters in which time they were living. |

6楼2013-05-26 20:54:37
|
7楼2013-05-27 08:12:34
|
8楼2013-05-27 08:12:41
tuqin2575
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
专家
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.681
- 金币: 5636.5
- 散金: 469
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 2701
- 在线: 234.6小时
- 虫号: 1543081
- 注册: 2011-12-19
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 农业水利
|
Whether they can use computor, or travel or not depended on the situations then. Most scholars cannot draw, write poems, or use classical Chinese language. Shakespeare can not use computor, either. Whether they are great scholars or not should not be judged by when they live, what they use, but by the mind they have established or adovated. In those fifty years the communication between scholars were acturally good. Just my opinion. ![]() |

9楼2013-05-27 08:20:53
tuqin2575
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
专家
- ESEPI: 42
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.681
- 金币: 5636.5
- 散金: 469
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 2701
- 在线: 234.6小时
- 虫号: 1543081
- 注册: 2011-12-19
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 农业水利

10楼2013-05-27 08:22:47













回复此楼
