| ²é¿´: 1257 | »Ø¸´: 20 | |||
tuqin2575Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ר¼Ò
|
[½»Á÷]
What are the differences between present professors and those before 1970s?
|
| In the May Day holiday I bought a book named "Scholars in my contemporaries" by Ji Xianlin £¨ÎÒÃÇÕâÒ»´ú¶ÁÊéÈË£©. It was soon possessed by my uncle, an aged editor, and read in advance. In exchange he present me another book, Fates of free intellectuals in China, one book concerns about the deeds and fates of learners, professors like Feng Youlan, Hu Shi, Wu Han, Qian Zhongshu and many other names I'm not so familiar before and in the "Great Cultural Revolution". I do not wanna talk about too much details in it. There is a view, "In those days the scholars or professors were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased..." Do you agree with that? And what do you think are the differences between them, present professors and those before 1970s? |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ085601
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
22408 µ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ɳ·¢+1£¬½ð±Ò+0.5, ¹§Ï²ÇÀ¸öɳ·¢£¬ÔÙ¸ø¸öºì°ü
Сľ³æ: ɳ·¢+1£¬½ð±Ò+0.5, ¹§Ï²ÇÀ¸öɳ·¢£¬ÔÙ¸ø¸öºì°ü
| 1 |
2Â¥2013-05-26 12:58:15
¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.2, ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.2, ÇÀÁ˸öС°åµÊ£¬¸ø¸öºì°ü
|
e [ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ] |
3Â¥2013-05-26 12:58:23
winter_north
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ESEPI: 113
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.321
- ½ð±Ò: 5614.5
- É¢½ð: 1975
- ºì»¨: 45
- ɳ·¢: 21
- Ìû×Ó: 4840
- ÔÚÏß: 929.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1567257
- ×¢²á: 2012-01-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÛȾ¿ØÖÆ»¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
May2012: ½ð±Ò+5, dear brother....did you stay up late or get up early......:shuai::shuai::shuai: 2013-05-26 14:39:47
May2012: ½ð±Ò+5, dear brother....did you stay up late or get up early......:shuai::shuai::shuai: 2013-05-26 14:39:47
|
No. 1, the old scholars can not use computer, I am sure of that, but most of the contemporary ones can. No. 2, the old ones must fly less than most of their contemporary counterparts. No. 3, so, how should we define the word scholar? Does it mean a person who studies and write words? If that is true, perhaps contemporary scholars study more subjects. Who are contemporary scholars in your opinion? Did any names appear in your heart? Yuan Longping, Rao Yi, Fang Zhouzi, are the names I can remember. |
4Â¥2013-05-26 14:12:31
00waterh
ľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- ESEPI: 36
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.936
- ½ð±Ò: 4731.7
- É¢½ð: 9439
- ºì»¨: 81
- ɳ·¢: 42
- Ìû×Ó: 6185
- ÔÚÏß: 939.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2129944
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-16
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Éñ¾¿ÆÑ§¡¢ÈÏÖª¿ÆÑ§ÓëÐÄÀí
those days£¬ most are poor professors£»rich now![]() [ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ] [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2013-5-26 at 18:32 ] |
5Â¥2013-05-26 18:17:28
nwsuafliu
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- ESEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 42 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2406.9
- É¢½ð: 1449
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 1437
- ÔÚÏß: 315.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 136928
- ×¢²á: 2005-12-17
- רҵ: ×÷Îï·Ö×ÓÓýÖÖ
|
you've raised an interesting topic here. As those scholars in the book was mainly the big names from humanities or social sciences, the comparison is better restricted within the same or related fields. People may also say that " In those days the graduates were cultivated or made manually, so valuable; in contrast, they are produced in batches nowadays, so the quality is decreased ...". Some people even argue that the bachelors today are only on the level of high school graduates 30 years ago. personally, i do not think scholars before 1970s had higher academic level, better academic training or greater academic achievements than those of today. One should not ignore the word " valuable". There were so few scholars that many of them could be "visible" or provided with favorable positions. take a look on today's university or institutions, scholars are facing much harder competition and often distracted from their own study. I would say, "less is more" happened in those days, and is replaced by "more is less" today. it not matters how qualified they are, it matters in which time they were living. |

6Â¥2013-05-26 20:54:37
|
7Â¥2013-05-27 08:12:34
|
8Â¥2013-05-27 08:12:41
tuqin2575
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ר¼Ò
- ESEPI: 42
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.681
- ½ð±Ò: 5636.5
- É¢½ð: 469
- ºì»¨: 36
- ɳ·¢: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2701
- ÔÚÏß: 234.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1543081
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-19
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ũҵˮÀû
|
Whether they can use computor, or travel or not depended on the situations then. Most scholars cannot draw, write poems, or use classical Chinese language. Shakespeare can not use computor, either. Whether they are great scholars or not should not be judged by when they live, what they use, but by the mind they have established or adovated. In those fifty years the communication between scholars were acturally good. Just my opinion. ![]() |

9Â¥2013-05-27 08:20:53
tuqin2575
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
ר¼Ò
- ESEPI: 42
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.681
- ½ð±Ò: 5636.5
- É¢½ð: 469
- ºì»¨: 36
- ɳ·¢: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 2701
- ÔÚÏß: 234.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1543081
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-19
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ũҵˮÀû

10Â¥2013-05-27 08:22:47














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
