24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 333  |  回复: 0

jiukai

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投稿Journal of Paleolimnology,审稿人的意见看不懂。文章与无机地球化学有关!

之前投稿Journal of Paleolimnology,被reject了,但编辑说按照意见重新修改可以重新投稿,审稿意见有7页,意见很专业。悲剧的是,有几条意见看不懂。
比如1、A number of aspects have to be listed too (i) dependence of grain size (many trace elements, (ii) geochemical provenance of the source of the detrital influx, (iii) weathering state of the detrital input components, (iv) trace elements which form oxy-anions and their relationship to the dissolved influx.  (i)提到的dependence of grain size是什么啊?(iii) 说明陆缘组分的风化情况,完全不懂。还有(vi)中的dissloved influx是什么意思呀, 真心不懂!!!
2、Note, that the enrichment of U and Mo is also affected by lake internal cycling, does not depend on the anoxic conditions alone but demands for dissolved influx of U(VI). I suggest focussing the discussion on U/Th depth profiles and comparison of U/Th with other sediment records. The U/Th of terrestrial siliciclastics is high (~ 4], lacustrine sediments record a decrease of Th/U related to the dissolved influx of U(VI). Is there a correlation between Th/U and Al.这条意见中一会说U/Th,一会儿说Th/U,是不编辑写错了啊?
3、The data sets graphical presented in Fig 6a includes calcareous sediment sections I cannot believe the rather constant CaO/Al ratio ! 这条意见说样品数据点包含了calcareous sediment ,因此,不认为 CaO/Al 比值的关系有问题?还说没懂什么意思?
除了这些,还有很多问题,都没有修改的信心了。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

智能机器人

Robot (super robot)

我们都爱小木虫

相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jiukai 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见