|
|
[交流]
被Science拒了,附上退稿意见,是说不在期刊的范围内吗?
|
Your manuscript was evaluated for breadth of interest and interdisciplinary significance by our in-house staff. Your work was compared to other manuscripts that we have received in the field of *******. Although there were no concerns raised about the technical aspects of the study, the consensus view was that your results would be better received and appreciated by an audience of sophisticated specialists. Thus, the overall opinion, taking into account our limited space and distributional goals, was that your submission did not appear to provide sufficient basic insight to be considered further for presentation to the broad readership of Science. |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
某top大学教授说“能够在市场中兑现的能力才是真能力”无比同意!
已经有13人回复
同一个分子,一条来自文献,一条来自AI——不告诉你答案,你会选哪条?
已经有7人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|