24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chengjun6819

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 10 (幼儿园)
金币: 1047.8
散金: 86
红花: 50
帖子: 128
在线: 215.8小时
虫号: 1124910
注册: 2010-10-17
性别: GG
专业: 常微分方程与动力系统

[求助] 散金币求申诉模版（论文被拒）(急)

虫友们，我修改稿被拒了，三个人，就第二个审稿人不同意，另外两个都同意发表，我把编辑发来的信附在下面，麻烦大家帮我出出主意，现在改怎么办？申诉还是就这么忍了？另求申诉模版

Ref.:  Ms. No. NEUCOM-D-12-01498R1
Finite-time boundedness for a class of delayed Markovian jumping neural networks with partly unknown transition probabilities
Neurocomputing

Dear Dr Cheng,

Please find below the referee reports. Based on these and in particular to serious concerns of Reviewer #2, I have to reach the sad conclusion that your paper
cannot be accepted for publication in Neurocomputing. I hope that the referees' comments and suggestions are nevertheless useful and can help you improving your scientific work and/or presentation.

Hereby I would like to thank you for submitting your work to Neurocomputing and welcome you to consider us again in the future.

Sincerely,

Tom Heskes
Editor in Chief
Neurocomputing

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer  #1: The new version is written clearer and I think that the paper is suitable for publication.

Reviewer #2: The paper has been significantly improved, but there are still some points are not clear enough.
1. Since "the transition rates of jumping process in this paper are still considered to be accessed in this paper", Why "the transition probabilities matrix considered in this paper is more general assumption to Markovian jump systems"?
2. I don't think it is clear enough of the remark, Remark 6, for equations (20), (21) and others. What is its physical meaning?

3.  A paper from the same authors has been submitted to Journal of Applied Mathematics(JAM) with similar techniques as that in this paper to some extent. Therefore, I don't think it is suitable to be published.

Reviewer #3: I think this paper can be accepted by the revision.

回复此楼