24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 962  |  回复: 2

chengjun6819

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 散金币求申诉模版(论文被拒)(急)

虫友们,我修改稿被拒了,三个人,就第二个审稿人不同意,另外两个都同意发表,我把编辑发来的信附在下面,麻烦大家帮我出出主意,现在改怎么办? 申诉还是就这么忍了? 另求申诉模版


Ref.:  Ms. No. NEUCOM-D-12-01498R1
Finite-time boundedness for a class of delayed Markovian jumping neural networks with partly unknown transition probabilities
Neurocomputing

Dear Dr Cheng,

Please find below the referee reports. Based on these and in particular to serious concerns of Reviewer #2, I have to reach the sad conclusion that your paper
cannot be accepted for publication in Neurocomputing. I hope that the referees' comments and suggestions are nevertheless useful and can help you improving your scientific work and/or presentation.

Hereby I would like to thank you for submitting your work to Neurocomputing and welcome you to consider us again in the future.

Sincerely,

Tom Heskes
Editor in Chief
Neurocomputing

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer  #1: The new version is written clearer and I think that the paper is suitable for publication.

Reviewer #2: The paper has been significantly improved, but there are still some points are not clear enough.
1. Since "the transition rates of jumping process in this paper are still considered to be accessed in this paper", Why "the transition probabilities matrix considered in this paper is more general assumption to Markovian jump systems"?
2. I don't think it is clear enough of the remark, Remark 6, for equations (20), (21) and others. What is its physical meaning?

3.  A paper from the same authors has been submitted to Journal of Applied Mathematics(JAM) with similar techniques as that in this paper to some extent. Therefore, I don't think it is suitable to be published.

Reviewer #3: I think this paper can be accepted by the revision.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

SCI写作及技巧

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chengjun6819: 金币+1, 有帮助 2013-04-30 15:13:30
2楼2013-04-29 18:04:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wulishi8

专家顾问 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
chengjun6819: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2013-04-30 15:13:40
模板不重要,重要的是看起来编辑十分在意第二个审稿人,你要把第二个审稿人提出的问题做相应的解答在你的申诉信中,不一定使第二个审稿人满意,但是想着让编辑满意的观点出发。并且强调,如果第二个还不同意,那么可否送另外的第四个审稿人。单纯的申诉,基本都被无情拒绝,要申诉地有理有据。
中山大学材料学院招聘博士后和专职研究员,年薪20万起,请站内联系,谢谢。
3楼2013-04-29 22:04:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chengjun6819 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见