24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

熊猫侠

木虫 (著名写手)

双子座之魂

应助: 52 (初中生)
金币: 341
散金: 8048
红花: 90
帖子: 2618
在线: 796.4小时
虫号: 1218233
注册: 2011-03-02
性别: GG
专业: 资源循环科学

[求助] Waste Management编辑回复，大牛来看看，这是为啥？？？？？？？？？？？已有1人参与

The above referenced manuscript was recently submitted to Waste Management with a view to publication and was sent for peer review. Based on the comments and recommendations received from the reviewers and on my review of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that we are not in a position to accept your manuscript for publication in Waste Management in its current form.

However, I feel that the paper contains information of potential interest to readers of Waste Management. Therefore, I wish to invite you to address all points raised by reviewers, taking all time you may deem necessary, and to resubmit a new version of the paper to the journal via the EES system.

It should be underlined that the paper would not be considered as a revised version but as a new manuscript, and would once again be forwarded to the peer-review process.

I am sorry our decision could not be more positive, but I look forward to receiving a re-submitted version of the paper.

Kind Regards

Ian D. Williams
Associate Editor
Waste Management

三个评审都是小修，而且表示了浓厚的兴趣，为啥还给拒稿了，并且竟然还邀请按照评审意见修改后重新投稿！！这是啥意思啊？麻烦大牛来看看，给点意见！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

带资进组求博导收留已经有10人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有11人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有4人回复
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言已经有3人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有3人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有8人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是评职称时认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？已经有4人回复

熊猫会功夫，谁也挡不住！

1楼 2013-04-16 09:05:54

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

峰风41

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 0.1
散金: 118
红花: 3
帖子: 456
在线: 273.1小时
虫号: 1843948
注册: 2012-06-01
专业: 可再生与替代能源利用中的

楼主，你好。我也遇到你waste management 当年一样的问题，我不知道该怎么办了，想问一下你当年的文章最后是怎么样的。是改完后又重新投到了这个杂志，然后被送外审再走一遍流程？还是直接就录用了。

The above referenced manuscript was recently submitted to Waste Management with a view to publication and was sent for peer review. Based on the comments and recommendations received from the reviewers and on my review of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that we are not in a position to accept your manuscript for publication in Waste Management in its current form.

However, I feel that the paper contains information of potential interest to readers of Waste Management. Therefore, I wish to invite you to submit a new manuscript on this topic.  If you elect to submit a new manuscript, then should must (1) list the original manuscript in the cover letter, (2) include a point by point response to the reviewer's comments, and (3) submit the revised manuscript within 6 months of the date of this letter.

It should be that the paper will not be considered as a revised version but as a new manuscript, and would once again be forwarded to the peer-review process.

I am sorry our decision could not be more positive, but I look forward to receiving a re-submitted version of the paper.

Kind Regards
Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
Waste Management