24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

luxqi

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 484.6
红花: 2
帖子: 102
在线: 23小时
虫号: 1277213
注册: 2011-04-25
专业: 食品科学基础

[求助] 两篇biological trace element research 投稿状态疑问已有1人参与

一篇3月19投稿，很快with editor，送审，送审1周左右，4月2日状态改为reviews completed.今天4月12号了，10天还是这个状态，正常吗？

另外一篇先前投了两个杂志很快以方向不符被拒，接着投biological trace element research ，4月6日（周六）投，4月8日状态改为revise，view decision状态为Major revision required，view letter内容为：

Dear Dr. *:

We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "*******", which you submitted to Biological Trace Element Research.

Based on the advice received, your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments. Your list of responses should be uploaded as a separate file in addition to your revised manuscript.

Your revision is due by May 08, 2013.

In order to submit your revised manuscript electronically, please access the following website:

http://bter.edmgr.com/

Your username is: ********
Your password is: ********

Please click "Author Login" to submit your revision.

If you require more time, please contact us immediately so we can adjust your revision submission deadline accordingly.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Sincerely yours,

Dr. Gerhard Schrauzer
Editor-in-Chief
Biological Trace Element Research

Dr. Manuel Flores-Arce
Managing Editor
Biological Trace Element Research

COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

********

Reviewer #1: This paper may become acceptable for publication in BTER but first must be returned to the authors for another round of proofreading, perferably with the aid of a colleague with a good command of English. In the text one finds numerous errors. For example, the singular is used when the plural is indicated, as well as other errors such as missing articles or prepositions, for example the sentence, in the Abstract, 'Four Chinese traditional cooking methods (steam, paste, deep-fry and milk-cereals) were chose to study the effects of Chinese cooking on selenium (Se) content and speciation in Se-enriched cereals', which should read, 'Four Chinese traditional cooking methods were chosen to study the effects of Chinese cooking methods on the selenium (Se) contents and the Se species in Se-enriched cereals'. (By the way, what do the authors mean by milk-cereals' and 'milking cereals'?)
Also, the text should be shortened with general statements concerning the biologica roles of Se omitted,

好像也没有时间送外审，但又有审稿意见，这是怎么回事?
从信件内容看，编辑的意思是修改后在送审，还是修改后决定是否接收呢？

刚开始投文章，没经验，请各位大侠们指点一下，多谢！

回复此楼