| ²é¿´: 485 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | |||
wxqtjwÌú³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
]°ïÎÒÈóɫһ¾ä»°£¬ººÒëÓ¢£¬Ê¹Ëü¸üÁ÷³©Ò»Ð©¡£
|
||
|
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¶Î»°ÊÇÎÒ×Ô¼ºÐ´µÄ¶ÔÒ»·ùͼµÄÓ¢ÎÄ×¢ÊÍ£¬¸Ð¾õÓÐЩ†ªà£¬¿ÉÒÔ¼ÓһЩ´Ê£¬¼õһЩ´Ê£¬Ê¹Ëü¸üÁ÷³©Ò»Ð©£¬Ð»Ð»´ó¼Ò¡£ Fig. 2. Outline of defects handled by binary image processing in interface zone. (a) the interface thickness and defect rate was respectively 5¦Ìm and 22.5%. (b) the interface thickness and defect rate was respectively 13.4¦Ìm and 23.7%. (c) the interface thickness and defect rate was respectively 12.6¦Ìm and 16.5%. [ Last edited by wxqtjw on 2013-4-6 at 16:42 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
307ÖÐÒ½¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0854Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ344Çóµ÷¼ÁË«·Ç¹¤¿ÆÑ§Ð£»ò¿ÎÌâ×é
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬326ÇóÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´

phu_grassman
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
¿ìÀÖµº¡¢²¼¼ªµºµºÖ÷
- ·ÒëEPI: 265
- Ó¦Öú: 7 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.392
- ½ð±Ò: 7538.7
- É¢½ð: 11599
- ºì»¨: 107
- ɳ·¢: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 5611
- ÔÚÏß: 1480.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1151372
- ×¢²á: 2010-11-20
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: English Cafe
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2013-04-06 21:45:12
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+4, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, лл 2013-04-07 18:01:04
°®ÓëÓêÏÂ: ½ð±Ò+1 2013-04-06 21:45:12
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+4, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, лл 2013-04-07 18:01:04
|
Fig. 2. Outline of defects operated by binary image processing in the interfacial zone. the interface thickness and defect rate for (a), (b) and (c) were 5¦Ìm and 22.5%, 13.4¦Ìm and 23.7% and 12.6¦Ìm and 16.5%, respectively. |
2Â¥2013-04-06 21:08:19
hookhans
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Farmer
- ·ÒëEPI: 263
- Ó¦Öú: 186 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.142
- ½ð±Ò: 7919
- É¢½ð: 576
- ºì»¨: 51
- Ìû×Ó: 2092
- ÔÚÏß: 401.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2260260
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-25
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+4, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, лл 2013-04-07 18:00:54
wxqtjw: ½ð±Ò+4, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, лл 2013-04-07 18:00:54
|
Ref 1: Fig. 2. Outline of the defects in the interface zone treated by binary image processing method. (a) the interface thickness and the defect rate were 5 ¦Ìm and 22.5 %, respectively. (b) the interface thickness and the defect rate were 13.4 ¦Ìm and 23.7 % respectively. (c) the interface thickness and the defect rate were 2.6 ¦Ìm and 16.5%, respectively. Ref 2: Fig. 2. Outline of the defects in the interface zone treated by binary image processing method. The interface thickness and the defect rate were (a) 5 ¦Ìm and 22.5 %, (b) 13.4 ¦Ìm and 23.7 %, (c) 2.6 ¦Ìm and 16.5%, respectively. |

3Â¥2013-04-07 08:46:04













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥