| 查看: 795 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
dingjieboy金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
论文修回，审稿人的意见没看太懂，求教各位！
|
||
|
一篇荟萃分析修回，意见如下： This was a well thought out, systematic review of the papers/ research that is available. I think that you targeted the outcomes that would be of most interest when comparing the two methods of surgery. I think it was very important to include exactly how many papers had each particular data point, since for example, the cost outcome was only included in two articles. This brings to the attention of the reader that there is limited data on some of these outcomes. It would have been helpful to have the number of pt that were the denominator for each data point. For example, if a given data point has two of the twelve studies included, it would be helpful to know if the studies were the larger ones or the smaller ones. Overall, very good review. I appreciate the work that went into this meta-analysis. 审稿人的总体评价好像还不错，但要我说明每个评价数据（效应量）在多少篇纳入研究中被提及了。 但下滑线部分真的没看太懂，请给位达人指点，非常感谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申博发邮件
已经有8人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有9人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有7人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有8人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有8人回复
wanglu3353
禁虫 (著名写手)
★ ★
phu_grassman: 金币+1, thanks 2013-04-04 07:56:41
dingjieboy(phu_grassman代发): 金币+1, good 2013-04-14 09:41:06
phu_grassman: 金币+1, thanks 2013-04-04 07:56:41
dingjieboy(phu_grassman代发): 金币+1, good 2013-04-14 09:41:06
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2013-04-04 06:52:45
lvyunting
木虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 2
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 1603.5
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 453
- 在线: 109.4小时
- 虫号: 758569
- 注册: 2009-04-27
- 专业: 合成药物化学
2楼2013-04-03 10:37:04
hookhans
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
Farmer
- 翻译EPI: 263
- 应助: 186 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.142
- 金币: 7889
- 散金: 576
- 红花: 51
- 帖子: 2095
- 在线: 402.1小时
- 虫号: 2260260
- 注册: 2013-01-25
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2013-04-03 15:54:01
hookhans
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
Farmer
- 翻译EPI: 263
- 应助: 186 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.142
- 金币: 7889
- 散金: 576
- 红花: 51
- 帖子: 2095
- 在线: 402.1小时
- 虫号: 2260260
- 注册: 2013-01-25
- 专业: 催化化学
4楼2013-04-03 15:58:52