| 查看: 716 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
dingjieboy金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
论文修回，审稿人的意见没看太懂，求教各位！
|
|
|
一篇荟萃分析修回，意见如下： This was a well thought out, systematic review of the papers/ research that is available. I think that you targeted the outcomes that would be of most interest when comparing the two methods of surgery. I think it was very important to include exactly how many papers had each particular data point, since for example, the cost outcome was only included in two articles. This brings to the attention of the reader that there is limited data on some of these outcomes. It would have been helpful to have the number of pt that were the denominator for each data point. For example, if a given data point has two of the twelve studies included, it would be helpful to know if the studies were the larger ones or the smaller ones. Overall, very good review. I appreciate the work that went into this meta-analysis. 审稿人的总体评价好像还不错，但要我说明每个评价数据（效应量）在多少篇纳入研究中被提及了。 但下滑线部分真的没看太懂，请给位达人指点，非常感谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
E0414, 我的本子有没有希望？
已经有7人回复
-
有谁可曾问过你过的还好吗？
已经有17人回复
-
一篇论文同时出现在两个期刊，一模一样，这算不算学术不端，请各位老师斧正。
已经有12人回复
-
希望面上有个好结果
已经有7人回复
-
今年也是没消息就是没中么
已经有16人回复
-
三区计算机方向期刊推荐
已经有5人回复
-
sci论文二审求助
已经有5人回复
-
函评
已经有7人回复
-
买卖文章的刷屏了！
已经有3人回复
lvyunting
木虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 2
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 1603.5
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 453
- 在线: 109.4小时
- 虫号: 758569
- 注册: 2009-04-27
- 专业: 合成药物化学
2楼2013-04-03 10:37:04
hookhans
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
Farmer
- 翻译EPI: 263
- 应助: 186 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.142
- 金币: 7889
- 散金: 576
- 红花: 51
- 帖子: 2095
- 在线: 402小时
- 虫号: 2260260
- 注册: 2013-01-25
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2013-04-03 15:54:01
hookhans
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
Farmer
- 翻译EPI: 263
- 应助: 186 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.142
- 金币: 7889
- 散金: 576
- 红花: 51
- 帖子: 2095
- 在线: 402小时
- 虫号: 2260260
- 注册: 2013-01-25
- 专业: 催化化学
4楼2013-04-03 15:58:52
wanglu3353
禁虫 (著名写手)
★ ★
phu_grassman: 金币+1, thanks 2013-04-04 07:56:41
dingjieboy(phu_grassman代发): 金币+1, good 2013-04-14 09:41:06
phu_grassman: 金币+1, thanks 2013-04-04 07:56:41
dingjieboy(phu_grassman代发): 金币+1, good 2013-04-14 09:41:06
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2013-04-04 06:52:45