|
|
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
王磊磊0811: 金币+15, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-03-22 12:47:46
王磊磊0811: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2013-03-22 15:14:10
Trauma is the leading cause of death for individuals
between ages 1−44.
创伤是导致年龄处于1-44的个人死亡的主要因素。
More than one-third of patients die
before reaching the hospital.
超过三分之一的病人死在了去医院的路上。
In military trauma, outcomes are
even worse.
若是军事创伤，结果会更加严重。
Injuries are often more severe and can have the
additional complication of a prolonged prehospital phase,
defined as the time between injury and admission to the
hospital.
在入住医院前的长时间里（也就是从受伤到入院确诊的这段时间），创伤会更加严重并伴有并发症。 Hemorrhage accounts for 50% of penetrating
battlefield trauma mortality, and 80% of these deaths are
secondary to injury in the torso, where conventional methods
for hemostasis, such as pressure dressings, tourniquets,
QuikClot, or HemCon are impossible (noncompressible
injuries).
出血占穿透性战场创伤死亡率的50%，这些死伤中有80%是由于二次躯体创伤，在这像加压包扎、止血带、止血剂这些传统的止血方法是不可能的。
The way Clifford poses the challenge is that
while civilian blunt trauma patients may have a “golden hour”,
military personnel with penetrating trauma may only have a
“platinum 5 minutes”, during which, catastrophic hemorrhage
may occur.
Clifford方法面临的挑战是，钝伤的病人可能有一个“黄金小时”，穿透性创伤的军事人员仅有一个“白金五分钟”，在此期间，可能会发生恶性出血。
This places a large emphasis on the first-response
medics to stabilize patients prior to transportation to a hospital.
这就强调，急护人员需要在转移到医院前稳住病人。
For civilian and noncivilian application, there is a tremendous
unmet need for a field-administrable hemostatic agent to
address internal hemorrhage.
对于民用和非民用，都急需一个可以针对内出血的地方许可性止血剂。 |
|
回复此楼