24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 579  |  回复: 4

探路者435

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投稿《energy policy》文章修改碰到难题了,急求助啊

1. The regression model is established based on the historical time series data of energy demand, GDP, secondary industry proportion, and urbanization rate of China.  Therefore, it is well expected that when the authors use this model to forecast the future energy demand, the energy consumptions in the forecasting years are estimated to increase monotonically with the assumptions of continues and steadily high-speed GDP growth, industrialization, and urbanization in the next decade. The policy implications the authors derived from the analysis are just the positive relationships between economic growth, industrialization, urbanization in China and the total energy consumption in the future, which I am not convinced are very meaningful policy insights contributed to the literature.
2. There are some important policy variables missing in this study, which attempts to forecast the energy consumption in China in the future, as well as analyze the key driving factors on energy demand of the country.  Most importantly, China is working hard to improve energy efficiency in its economy.  The government has set the goal of reducing energy intensity by around 16% in the 12th Five-Year Plan period, and aims to reduce carbon intensity by 40%-45% by 2020.  These goals set by the government would greatly affect the trend of energy demand growth in China.  Future projections on technical innovation, efficiency improvement, as well as energy consumption structural changes should also be taken into consideration.
3.The main point I have with the paper is that it does not meet academic standard of the journal, but rather follows the style of a (political) opinion peace. This is mainly reflected in the style of writing (“our country’s energy demand”, p. 2). As a side note, the level of English does not meet the required standard either.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chinalynch

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
energy policy有很多中国人发,编辑们对中国的能源问题应该很了解了。来点创意吧
保持簡單和方向
2楼2013-03-06 10:48:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

探路者435

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by chinalynch at 2013-03-06 10:48:50
energy policy有很多中国人发,编辑们对中国的能源问题应该很了解了。来点创意吧

你只是看见部分的信息,不要给予下结论。肯定有不同和创意,现在请教怎么修改啊
3楼2013-03-08 12:11:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

热茶79

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

虽然只有3个问题,但是语气里听出不太想接收呀,好好修改吧。
加油
4楼2013-05-26 21:06:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wzxkm

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

好好修改,然后换个期刊投!
有志者事竞成
5楼2013-07-30 09:30:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 探路者435 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见