| 查看: 700 | 回复: 4 | |||
[求助]
投稿《energy policy》文章修改碰到难题了，急求助啊
|
|
1. The regression model is established based on the historical time series data of energy demand, GDP, secondary industry proportion, and urbanization rate of China. Therefore, it is well expected that when the authors use this model to forecast the future energy demand, the energy consumptions in the forecasting years are estimated to increase monotonically with the assumptions of continues and steadily high-speed GDP growth, industrialization, and urbanization in the next decade. The policy implications the authors derived from the analysis are just the positive relationships between economic growth, industrialization, urbanization in China and the total energy consumption in the future, which I am not convinced are very meaningful policy insights contributed to the literature. 2. There are some important policy variables missing in this study, which attempts to forecast the energy consumption in China in the future, as well as analyze the key driving factors on energy demand of the country. Most importantly, China is working hard to improve energy efficiency in its economy. The government has set the goal of reducing energy intensity by around 16% in the 12th Five-Year Plan period, and aims to reduce carbon intensity by 40%-45% by 2020. These goals set by the government would greatly affect the trend of energy demand growth in China. Future projections on technical innovation, efficiency improvement, as well as energy consumption structural changes should also be taken into consideration. 3.The main point I have with the paper is that it does not meet academic standard of the journal, but rather follows the style of a (political) opinion peace. This is mainly reflected in the style of writing (“our country’s energy demand”, p. 2). As a side note, the level of English does not meet the required standard either. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有13人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有9人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有25人回复
-
2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件，有关系吗？
已经有28人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有26人回复
-
出来了
已经有9人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有28人回复
-
哪位高人中了，把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看，让我长长见识
已经有5人回复
chinalynch
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1145.3
- 散金: 20
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 437
- 在线: 189.1小时
- 虫号: 1869395
- 注册: 2012-06-25
- 专业: 环境经济学
2楼2013-03-06 10:48:50
3楼2013-03-08 12:11:44
热茶79
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 3822.4
- 散金: 8
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 857
- 在线: 509.2小时
- 虫号: 1242756
- 注册: 2011-03-23
- 专业: 应用数学方法
4楼2013-05-26 21:06:01
5楼2013-07-30 09:30:15
投票:
