| 查看: 3839 | 回复: 59 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见，大家给些建议啊
|
|||
|
一篇文章，之前投到Nanoscale，两个审稿人一小修接受一个要求动物实验建议拒稿重投，编辑给了重投，修改重投后原来的那个审稿人还是坚持要补动物实验并给了大修，结果编辑拒稿，泪。后来把修改稿投到了一个3分左右的收费杂志，晕，审稿意见比之前还多...其中对第二个审稿人的意见有几个问题想请大家给些意见。1，他的态度，是积极的么？2，我的文章是Results和discussion在一起写的，投的杂志很多也那么写，他貌似让分开写，要是那么整的话文章基本要重写了，有些不太想重写。希望大家给些建议。 审稿意见如下： REVIEWER 2 EVALUATION Overall this paper has much to comment it. However I was disappointed that there was a lack of numerical data given in the results section, any reader has to depend on the figures, this needs to be rectified. In addition the results would benefit from and be much tighter if the discussion was removed and placed with the conclusions in a combined discussion/conclusions section. Finally the figure legends should be more expansive and stand on their own and not be dependant on the body of the text to support their interpretation. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
郑州大学申博
已经有6人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有18人回复
-
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现，多家期刊声明抵制
已经有5人回复
-
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
58楼2013-02-27 15:29:15
2楼2013-02-27 00:40:56
3楼2013-02-27 00:41:13
6楼2013-02-27 01:22:43