| 查看: 1620 | 回复: 3 | |||
[交流]
各位童鞋给看一下，Science China我的退稿信
|
|
1月6号提交的初稿，中国科学技术科学，结果12号就回来了退稿信，我也搞不清外审为什么就一个结果,打电话过去还没说什么编辑就把我劈头盖脸骂了一顿，说我没必要打电话来，我这种小学生登不了大雅之堂的意思（本人虽然小博在读，老师没名气）退了就是退了，而我觉得审稿人根本没有看明白我做了什么，就说我和参考文献的思路一致，我觉得匪夷所思，各位看一下这个审稿意见很严厉吗？轻拍，已经经不起打击了： This paper uses “ ” The expression of this paper is not clear. Some questions are listed as follows. 1.In the Introduction the authors assert that “ ”. However, this has been proposed by Reference [7]. 2.Will the authors discuss the differences between their proposed method and those in [7] and [9] and the main advantages of the proposed method? 3.There are many grammatical errors, which greatly influence the readability of this paper. The English writing should be carefully checked and improved. Besides, many spaces are omitted and we suggest the authors pay more attention to the editing of their paper. 各位给点意见，我现在有点找不到北的感觉..... [ Last edited by snowwind1987 on 2013-1-14 at 19:32 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有14人回复
-
论文的挂名怎么评判贡献？基金申请中，排名第一的挂名文章
已经有3人回复
-
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
闲聊
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 综述投化工进展，外审回来被退稿
已经有3人回复
- Science China Information Science 的快讯
已经有3人回复
- 投稿半年今天收到退稿信
已经有21人回复
- science china交流
已经有11人回复
- Science China E, 审稿意见返回了，请大家给点意见
已经有18人回复
2楼2013-01-14 19:54:51
3楼2013-01-14 20:49:13
4楼2013-01-15 09:53:04