应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research这种情况要修改重投吗？
31/1返回列表
查看: 757  |  回复: 2
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

doublebei

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research这种情况要修改重投吗？ 已有1人参与

投Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research，过了八个月，审稿意见终于回来了，一个审稿人说写的不错，给小修，另外一个审稿人就只是说创新性太小，最后编辑给的是拒绝，拒信就是标准的IECR拒信，如下， It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are attached. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that includes such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.
但网上有人说这也算是一种大修，而且我的状态也是处于"Revisions and Resubmissions Requested by Editorial Office”的状态，那到底要不要修改后重投呢？而且第二个审稿人的意见怎么回复啊？请高人指点。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2013-01-05 11:25:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主
既然是"Revisions and Resubmissions Requested by Editorial Office”，那么应该修改后重投
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2013-01-05 11:45:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

doublebei

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2013-01-05 11:45:40
既然是"Revisions and Resubmissions Requested by Editorial Office”，那么应该修改后重投

哦，谢谢
回复此楼
3楼2013-01-05 16:34:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 doublebei 的主题更新
31/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭