| 查看: 2703 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
Journal of material chemistry-A 投稿 评审意见 机会大吗
|
|
下面是我12月15号投的JMC-A后的审稿意见,大家帮我看看,机会大吗?我第一次投的是Comunication,看编辑的意思是不是要我修改稿改为full paper.另外这个修改时间大概要求多久呀,毕竟还要重新写呀! Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A. We have now received the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, which are copied below. The reviewers feel that major modifications are necessary before publication can be considered. With regards to the comments of referee 2 that the manuscript should be resubmitted as a full paper rather than as a communication, having read through your manuscript and the comments of both referees, we agree that the manuscript is not sufficiently urgent to justify publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A as a communication. Therefore, publication of your manuscript in its present form is not possible. However providing that the comments of the reviewers are addressed in full I will be pleased to consider a revised full paper version of your manuscript. The manuscript may be subject to further peer review prior to reaching a final decision on acceptance. You can submit your revised manuscript through your Author Centre at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jmchema . You will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Alternatively, follow the link below to create your revision: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ ... b4MdrNHbhMrqwC8Pc3x Please note that the deep link in this email is generated for the convenience of our customers. The link goes straight to the user’s account without the need to log on to the system, therefore, for your account security, you should not share this link with others. Please provide the following as separate files: • A suitably revised manuscript in native format (.DOC or TeX) with high quality embedded figures OR • A suitably revised manuscript in native format (.DOC or TeX) with numbered figures, as separate files in .TIF, or .EPS format, with resolution of 600 dpi or greater and schemes preferably as ChemDraw files. Chemwindow files (filename.cwg, filename.cw2), ISIS/Draw exported as sketch format (filename.skc) and ChemSketch exported in ChemDraw format (filename.cdx) may also be supplied. Providing the original figure and scheme files in their native formats will assist us in ensuring the best quality production of your article. • A table of contents entry. This should include: * Colour graphic: maximum size 8 cm x 4 cm * Text: one sentence, of maximum 20 words, highlighting the novelty of the work • Suitably revised Electronic Supplementary Information (if any) • Suitably revised CIF(s) and corresponding CheckCIF reports (if necessary) • A response to the comments made by the reviewer(s). You should also document any changes you have made to the original manuscript. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). • If you have chosen publication online as an Accepted Manuscript, please provide a PDF version of your revised manuscript including figures, suitable for publication online (no highlighting, track changes etc). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. As we aim to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Journal of Materials Chemistry A, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of Materials Chemistry A and I look forward to receiving your revision. Yours sincerely, Catherine [ Last edited by baroncq on 2013-1-4 at 19:30 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有3人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 半月前投的JMC，前天被拒了，但是两个审稿人comment里都有修改重投的意思
已经有8人回复
- JMC审稿时间究竟有多久？
已经有25人回复
- 请问，哪位大侠有JMC投稿的TOC的说明和要求？谢谢
已经有16人回复
- JMC 这个是大修吗？
已经有20人回复
- JMC返修求助！
已经有5人回复
- J. Mater.Chem.给的大修，但是编辑的信是这么写的怎么回事？
已经有40人回复
- JMC paper 投稿指南求助， 万分期待！！！
已经有7人回复
- 如何应对评审专家意见说论文的研究或实验代表性不足
已经有7人回复
- SCI评审意见为创新性不足怎么办？
已经有49人回复
- 请问评审意见回来后，Technical Editor的答复等待中是什么意思？
已经有12人回复
- 第一次发sci期刊，请帮忙看下评审意见
已经有20人回复
- RSC和ACS的审稿意见结果什么的是共享的吗？？被拒后重投有什么经验？？
已经有10人回复
- 关于JMC投稿
已经有11人回复
- JMC 投稿状态求高手指点
已经有11人回复
- 金币全部送出 关于JMC你知道什么
已经有23人回复
- JMC短篇communication 审稿+接受 14天
已经有73人回复
- 评审意见如何回复
已经有12人回复
- 投稿时，大家喜欢推荐评审人吗？
已经有15人回复
- RSC JMC 投稿求助？
已经有8人回复
2楼2013-01-04 16:53:39
3楼2013-01-04 16:55:43
4楼2013-01-04 17:24:17
5楼2013-01-04 17:26:18
6楼2013-01-04 21:19:33
