24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1817  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhaoxuchen

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助!文章返回大修,提出的修改意见

求助啊!
文中第二段让人难理解,意思是说我要把全文总长度的25%删减掉,然后补充在“Environmental Implications” and ”Conclusions” 部分?
This absence of a true scientific motivation for this work becomes evident when the chapter on “environmental implications” (Page 17) talks for 13 lines about straw, before corncobs are brought back into the picture. Unfortunately, the importance of corncob-derived chars is only postulated based on comparisons with soil and humic acid, but not through comparison with char made from a different feedstock (Page 17, line 18).
As it stands, the piece has a plethora of solid data but is lacking a message that would distinguish it from a laboratory report. I recommend to ask the author(s) for a revision that reduces the overall length of the text by at least 25% and replaces the “Environmental Implications” and ”Conclusions” chapters with robust inference in support of the authors claim that “Corncob biochars would be a promising sorbent for mitigating agricultural pesticide contamination”.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

slmyeye

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主理解正确,按照审稿人的意见去修改呗,这个不属于技术性问题!改后被录用的几率非常高啊!
3楼2012-12-31 08:37:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhaoxuchen: 金币+3, 有帮助 2013-01-01 15:59:12
楼主的理解基本正确
2楼2012-12-31 08:17:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll9999

专家顾问 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
就是这样,按照审稿人的意见修改
4楼2012-12-31 09:27:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zwl_8307

银虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
理解对的,那就按照编辑部的要求修改吧
zwl
5楼2012-12-31 10:25:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见