|
|
[交流]
我的文章悲剧了,这可咋办呀。
reviewer 1
The CFD simulation of the syphoning effect is interestingG and the concepts presented in my opinion can warrant publication。However the quality of the paper especially in terms of literature review and background information all require much improvement in order to meet the minimum requirements of the journal。 In addition to this as a minor issue the standard of English requires some improvement。
reviewer 2
In my opinion article contains some interesting data. However the article is written in very unclear manner. English is very poor, sometimes it is absolutely unclear what authors are trying to say.
我悲剧了,最后文章被reject了,咋办呀?写英语文章真是太折磨我了。 |
» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|