| 查看: 5635 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
关于Major Revision for Reconsideration，求帮助！！！
|
|||
|
第一篇SCI,今天刚收到decision，给了大修，但是看专家意见里都是小问题，觉得应该小修就够了，各位看看机会大吗？谢谢了！ Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. We have now received the reviewers' reports, and regrettably I must inform you that the manuscript is not acceptable for publication in its present form, and requires major revision before it can be reconsidered for publication. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. I believe that the comments/suggestions made by the reviewers are self-explanatory. If you decide to revise the work, please submit an itemized list of changes which have been made in response to the reviewer's comments/suggestions or a rebuttal of why a particular comment/suggestion was not acted upon. In order to expedite publication of the manuscript, I would appreciate receiving the revised manuscript by Dec 15, 2012. To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/ijbiomac/ and login as an Author. On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there. Please note that the revised manuscript will then be sent to reviewers for further consideration. Thank you for your assistance and co-operation in the above matter. I look forward to receiving the revised manuscript. Kind regards. J Editor International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The manuscript * is an original paper research on the structure features of three kinds of nanoparticles. The preparation and structure of G-NPs was novel and very interesting. PLGA-NPs and C-NPs were commonly reported, but it was rarely reported on the preparation of G-NPs. Maybe it has good potential in the controlled release delivery as the author described. The self-assembly behavior and hydrolytic erosion were important information for the application of chitosan modified PLGA NPs. So I recommend the paper for publication in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules after revision. 1) Line 26,213 and 221. All "mv" should be indicated as "mV". 2) Line 115:"The excess linking reagents were removed by centrifugation and dialysis" The expression of medium and dialysis treatment time is not clear. 3) Line 210:" C-NPs had larger size due to the chitosan layer coating the surface of PLGA NPs. G-NPs had a mean diameter of 187.5±17.6nm, which was not significantly different with C-NPs." Please represent the diameter of C-NPs and the statistical value. 4) Please note the spacing mistakes and capital letters. Go over the paper and correct it. Ex, Line 192: "The peaks at1650cm-1 and…"Please note the spacing. "fig.3…emulsifying …" and "self-assembled… " Initial should be uppercase. Line 300:"…(Grant No.2012DFB50140), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81271727), and the Science and Technology Projects of Shandong province (Grant No. 2011GSF12124)" The spacing should be unified. 5) In "Measurement of the hydrolytic erosion", the nanoparticles were dispersed in PBS without string? Please described clearly. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 decision in progress |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有15人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 第三次major revision
已经有9人回复
- Major Revision，中稿的可能性 有多大？
已经有38人回复
- major revision 后多少天提交文章，有没有什么需要考虑的，谢谢！
已经有27人回复
- 投eisiver一期刊，从Major revision，到现在的revision，是什么意思
已经有12人回复
- Chemosphere杂志 major revision
已经有9人回复
- major revision 大家看有希望吗
已经有9人回复
- 请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的？
已经有19人回复
- 中国科学 F辑 英文稿-major revision
已经有44人回复
- 大家感觉SCI期刊做完Major revision后有多大几率能中？
已经有42人回复
- major revision问题 求助
已经有5人回复
- 困惑~~ 只有一个比较细节的comments，编辑却给了我major revision
已经有3人回复
- 投了一篇文章，审稿结果是“major revision”，帮忙看看评审意见，有戏没？
已经有32人回复
- Major revision，修改后提交了，希望有好结果
已经有23人回复
- Major revision 的文章修改后能发表的可能性大吗？
已经有28人回复
- Major revision and reconsideration还有希望吗？
已经有5人回复
- major revision 后该怎么办？
已经有16人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
6楼2012-11-21 18:35:34
visitor958
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
IEEE杂志与会议专家
- 应助: 2283 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.05
- 金币: 17310.5
- 散金: 2544
- 红花: 76
- 帖子: 15735
- 在线: 2926.6小时
- 虫号: 489254
- 注册: 2008-01-01
- 专业: IEEE
2楼2012-11-21 17:12:06
zhywu
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 138 (高中生)
- 金币: 4091.1
- 散金: 5566
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 5512
- 在线: 747.1小时
- 虫号: 1894958
- 注册: 2012-07-16
- 专业: 控制论中的数学方法
3楼2012-11-21 17:13:07
匿名
用户注销 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 549 (博士)
- 金币: 18649.1
- 散金: 3666
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 21829
- 在线: 1115.2小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2010-01-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 体育保健学
4楼2012-11-21 17:14:29
40