24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1229  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

小白不黑

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 急~这个审稿人的意见怎么回呀?

Reviewer #3: This paper by xxxx et al describes detailed theoretical analyses of all the ingredients that participate in the xxxx. The strengths of the paper are the studies of the different facets of xxxx with emphasis on the chemical structure of the compounds. The studies cover from single molecule properties to solid state structure. The weakness of the paper is the theoretical character and the mere description of many theoretical values without a deep insight on structure-property correlations. For example, insights on isomerisation are welcome and scarcely described in the manuscript.

The method of study is well known and no new approaches are discussed. The more novel analysis is the molecular mechanic studies and the evaluation of interesting xxxx parameters.

The paper is a little bit long and the English acceptable but still improvable.

Much theoretical literature is known on xxxx from the point of view of xxxx. So the novelty of these data is poor.

In summary, I find the paper in the borderline of acceptation. The interesting use of molecular mechanic should incline my evaluation towards acceptation.





第一个审稿人是几个语法错误,列出了123,所以回复比较有针对性。第三个审稿人说的很中肯,但不知道具体怎么改啊~

求高手帮助~
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

decision in progress

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zbj

至尊木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
小白不黑: 金币+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-12-05 09:52:28
审稿人的意见相当具体, 按照审稿人提出的线索,insight on structure-property correlations. For example, insights on isomerisation,... more novel analysis is the molecular mechanic studies and ... 做足功课并修改论文, 你就知道应当怎样回复审稿意见了。
4楼2012-11-13 23:18:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
小白不黑: 金币+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-12-05 09:52:14
主要是说你的创新不够。编辑没有拒,就应该没有大问题,尽量增加些内容,再好好解释,强调创新点。
2楼2012-11-13 22:21:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liu_xiao_jin

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
小白不黑: 金币+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-12-05 09:52:21
审稿人都建议接收了,这就比较好改了嘛,他虽然一方面说新意有点不够,但同时也肯定了亮点,一篇文章有个亮点就够了。所以你按照他提的修改下语言,再稍微的深入讨论下结果就算应付过去了。
得之泰然,失之淡然!
3楼2012-11-13 22:29:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

esub

木虫 (正式写手)

esub@qq.com

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
小白不黑: 金币+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2012-12-05 09:52:34
其实还是比较好回答的,要你比较一下异构体结构与材料特性的关系,找一些文献学着做一下这个分析就可以了。基本上增加个几十个字就行了
至于:Much theoretical literature is known on xxxx from the point of view of xxxx. So the novelty of these data is poor.
你可能要考虑下把这个作者的工作放到introduction里面,但要突出你本文的优势,优势他已经帮你总结了
科研群IF>3 166680015 共同打开SCI的大门
5楼2012-11-13 23:45:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见