| 查看: 657 | 回复: 7 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者努力着将赠送您 15 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
努力着荣誉版主 (职业作家)
低调隐士
|
[求助]
求审稿人意见 翻译。
|
|
|
今天收到了我投稿的一个SCI杂志的审稿人意见。编辑说：一个审稿人完全同意接受，但第二个审稿人却建议退稿，所以希望我能按照第二个审稿人的意见修改。 那厮给我了6个建议。但有的建议我看得不是很明白，用红颜色划出来了，请大家帮忙翻译一下，我答应在两周内给出修改稿，谢谢了。 Reviewer #2: 1. The paper is not clearly stated how the achievement of proposed method is performed; 2. The notation and definition used in the section 2 should be clearly stated beforehand to smooth the reading; 3. There are a lot of typos in the paper such as in page 2 " ....image is visible if any t (or more) of the participants are stacked together, but totally invisible if fewer .....", it should be modified as " .... image is visible if any t (or more) of participants are stacked together, but is totally invisible if ...."; 4. The adjacent sentences can not give the inference of the thinking of the paper such as "..the new system doesn't need a security channel and the cost of the system can be lowered; the size of the shadow image is smaller than the original image; the new scheme is also a multi-use scheme...." 5. The analysis is so loose that the reader cannot see the enhancement of the proposed algorithm; in addition, a pseudo code of the algorithm does not appear to have the global view of it. 6. The simulation need to compare with the work of Chien-Lin's scheme to show the difference. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有6人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有19人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有14人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有13人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有18人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有25人回复
夏雨静
木虫 (正式写手)
- 博学EPI: 1
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2034.5
- 散金: 367
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 857
- 在线: 110.1小时
- 虫号: 404564
- 注册: 2007-06-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 角膜及眼表疾病
3楼2007-07-03 21:24:06
2楼2007-07-03 21:08:57
hljbhs
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7114.9
- 帖子: 1534
- 在线: 12.4小时
- 虫号: 392491
- 注册: 2007-06-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物化工与食品化工
★
努力着(金币+1):谢谢！
努力着(金币+1):谢谢！
|
There are a lot of typos in the paper 文中有不少打字错误； The paper is not clearly stated how the achievement of proposed method is performed 该文中，所述方法是如何得到 该成果（结论）的，论述不清。 The adjacent sentences can not give the inference of the thinking of the paper 下文思路不清 a pseudo code of the algorithm does not appear to have the global view of it. 运算法则编排的似乎并未反应全貌 |
4楼2007-07-04 08:09:23
5楼2007-07-04 08:31:26
40