24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lxy_99

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 116.3
帖子: 8
在线: 18.3小时
虫号: 937799

[交流] IEEE Trans“revise and resubmit”希望还大吗？

审稿审了六七个月了，现在终于给了回复，三个审稿人的意见两个集中在语言和一些小问题上，还有一个提了几个比较专业的问题，还不太好回答。哎。。。
After careful review we have determined that your paper might be of interest for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, after revisions, if those revisions fully and
properly address the concerns of the reviewers. The comments
from the reviewers appearing below may include specific
revisions that are mandatory and other changes suggested. You
may have to make broader changes if necessary based on general
comments provided by the reviewers.
I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance.
It is, rather, a recognition by our reviewers and editors that
your paper merits some interest. Your revision will be reviewed by the same reviewers who read the current draft.
Please submit your revised paper within 60 days of receiving this letter. After 60 days the revision will expire and you will need an extension in order to submit the revised paper.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。已经有14人回复
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了已经有11人回复
江汉大学解明教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后已经有3人回复
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性已经有11人回复
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗已经有10人回复
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。已经有11人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-11-05 10:42:22

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 78 (初中生)
金币: 12705.7
帖子: 1478
在线: 820.2小时
虫号: 898876

★
lxy_99(金币+1): 谢谢参与

关键是审稿人的意见是否可以很好的回答。

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2012-11-05 10:48:24

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

查看全部 14 个回答

xkool

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 15 (小学生)
金币: 510
帖子: 860
在线: 903.3小时
虫号: 524771

★
lxy_99(金币+1): 谢谢参与

我最近投稿时，编辑回复了这个
There are 7 possible decisions that IEEE Trans UFFC allows Associate Editors to make on manuscripts submitted to IEEE Trans UFFC:
1. Accept
2. Minor Revision
3. Reject
4. Withdrawn
5. Resubmit as a Correspondence
6. Submit to another Journal
7. Reject with Recommendation for Resubmission

IEEE Trans UFFC no longer has the "Major Revision" option. "Major Revision" has been replaced by "Reject with Recommendation for Resubmission" which essentially means the same as "Major Revision." The "Major Revision" option was removed in order to prevent inventors from submitting incomplete papers in order to get credit for an early original submission date on their eventual publication for patent purposes. With the "Reject with Recommendation for Resubmission" option, authors no longer get credit for the date when they submitted their original manuscript. Instead, they get credit for the date when they submit the revised manuscript if the revision is decided to be "Accept" or "Minor Revision."

基于这个情况，你这个就是大修，希望是很大的。

[ Last edited by xkool on 2012-11-5 at 10:49 ]

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

2楼2012-11-05 10:47:46

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖