| 查看: 9940 | 回复: 73 | |||||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||||
[交流]
也分享一下论文被接收的喜悦，附coverletter作交流
|
|||||
|
前些时候羡慕论坛的一个兄弟在杂志corrosion science上接收的一篇论文，今天幸运也降临到我头上了，嘿嘿。这篇稿子自从投稿到现在经历了近2年时间,而且一审让我大修，修改后，发了很长的cover letter，今天终于被接收了。后面再贴出在三个星期前写的cover letter，希望与大家交流，请多提宝贵意见，谢谢。 另外，在另一个帖子里也贴了我的两封催稿信（http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=513227&fpage=0&highlight=&page=1），希望大家提供意见，以改善下次工作。 Dear Dr. Thank you for your enquiry. Your paper was received in my office on 11 June, and I am pleased to tell you that it has been accepted for publication in Corrosion Science, and is being sent to the publisher. A formal letter of acceptance will be sent to you, and you will receive proofs from the publisher in due course. Yours sincerely cover letter for revision manuscript Dear Prof. Dr. *** (Editor in Chief) I would like to thank the referees for their nice comments on our manuscript. Actually, I try my best to revise the manuscript with my co-authors. It spent me almost one month to contact with my professor in China and to discuss the improvement in both English grammar and contents of this manuscript. As you see, we made a major revision for this manuscript, (almost rewrote it). You can find the modified and revised parts which are marked with blue color and underlined bold text. However, some grammar modifications have not been marked in the manuscript. Furthermore, I hope our english can make others understand well our idea presented in our manuscript because no any native English speaker colleagues can be available around us. In the attached document, I try to give a rebuttal against each point of the comments. Most of them have been revised and improved along the comments. However, as we mentioned in this document, I left from this lab. *** years ago. Now, the project has been ended and all the researchers (students) have graduated or been dismissed from the laboratory. So, it is very difficult for me to ask help for some further research from this laboratory ***. Fortunately, along the comments, we emphasize and improve the analysis on the corrosion mechanisms *** using ***, which was used in some relative references. Actually, it could be accepted to analyze the corrosion behavior using this method, as mentioned in those references. Of course, the comments have raised our interest in this research.***. As reported in our latest papers, the *** could be improved significantly by ***. Recently, *** as excellent *** against *** corrosion, even better than the promising ***, has been found. We consider the results should be published. As interpreted in this manuscript, we are also interested in the corrosion behavior of the compared＊＊＊under the present environment. However, we can only improve it later due to the limitations of our present condition. ＊＊＊ We hope you and the reviewers could accept our rebuttals and provide us more comments so that we can improve our future work. Thank you for your kind help and attention. I am looking forward to your good news. Best Regards Yours sincerely *** [ Last edited by ymxiong on 2007-6-30 at 08:39 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 | 百宝箱 |
» 猜你喜欢
大佬帮着分析今年的评审意见？该课题连续申请了三年了，明年要不要换个方向。
已经有11人回复
-
两块石头
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有6人回复
blueseagood
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2523.3
- 散金: 1317
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 697
- 在线: 192.5小时
- 虫号: 381652
- 注册: 2007-05-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋环境科学
5楼2007-06-29 10:51:47
isspjieyang
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7805.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1283
- 在线: 452.1小时
- 虫号: 147042
- 注册: 2005-12-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
2楼2007-06-29 10:23:56
lizhenn4014
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 206.5
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 153
- 在线: 37.7小时
- 虫号: 310362
- 注册: 2006-12-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
3楼2007-06-29 10:27:08
媳妇说，不该 贴出来，因为我的很烂的英语，但地球人都知道俺英语不好，只是我认为大家都能明白我的意思，主要是想交流一下回复审稿人意见的经验，有的时候，虽然很被动，也不应该放弃！发论文，其实个人认为是发论文就是发思想（idea），只要你的思想有创新点，那怕有很多不足的地方，但一个创新点就足够发表了！个人观点，纯粹为了交流，以更好更快地发表高质量论文，也增进自己写作论文的能力。
4楼2007-06-29 10:45:53
