| 查看: 3905 | 回复: 12 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
IEEE TSP (AQ)，下来怎么弄？ 已有11人参与
|
||||
|
Accepted for publication with mandatory minor revisions(AQ) 编辑： Dear *** I am writing to you concerning the above referenced manuscript, which you submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. Based on the enclosed set of reviews (**See note below about attachments), I have decided that the manuscript be ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION WITH MANDATORY MINOR REVISIONS (AQ). Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: A - Publish Unaltered（第一个人第一次就是接受，这儿这个“Unaltered”是不是说他的意见没有改变？） Comments: The authors have responded to the questions I've raised in the first review, and they added to the paper to enhance the comparison to conventional ****. My main concern was that ****. The additional material provided by the authors show that when the ***, the performance of the proposed *** is comparable to conventional ****, while there's a factor of two reduction in the computational complexity. I find that this revision of the paper is of acceptable strength to published in the SP transactions. However, I recommend that the authors go through the paper and try to enhance the language usage as much as possible. Reviewer: 2(这个人上次直接据我的，说了一大堆问题，这次竟然啥意见没有了，晕) Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes Comments: (There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.) Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: A - Publish Unaltered（同第一个人，上次意见是接受。这里“Unaltered”是不是说这次意见和上次相同的意思） Comments: The authors have significantly improve and clarify their paper, even if the essence of the paper is still a subject which I think is somewhat ambiguous, they managed to point out some interesting tracks for people in the domain. I finally really thank the authors for the care with which they responded. 这种情况还会拒吗？编辑给了6周时间。但我看主要是让修改语言，这个东西修改了，怎么给编辑些response啊？上次问题多谢了好多response（3个人的加起来70多页了），这次修改语言热水ponse怎么写啊？ 望学长学姐们多多指点！ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 IEEE～A+ |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
A+» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有8人回复
-
中科院海洋所招收海洋材料相关领域博士研究生及研究助理
已经有4人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有3人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
入职后第一次管课题组的专利缴费，对账才发现官费比别人多掏了一倍
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投稿TSP，正在等待编辑决定，散金币求祝福吧
已经有131人回复
- 投IEEE 出现了一些问题疑惑，大神帮我解决一下！
已经有10人回复
- IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B 中了一篇文章，现在超页怎么弄？
已经有9人回复
- SCI期刊模板哪里找
已经有18人回复
- 请教IEEE TSP上传最终稿件的问题
已经有9人回复
- IEEE TSP悲剧，想改投IEEE SPL？
已经有7人回复
- IEEE TSP三审需要多长时间啊？
已经有11人回复
- IEEE TSP二审一般多长时间出结果？？？？
已经有4人回复
- 发了篇IEEE TAC，审了两篇IEEE TAC和IEEE TSP，说点收获
已经有38人回复
- With A/E for Recommendation
已经有4人回复
nuaawq
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 2144 (讲师)
- 金币: 32343.1
- 散金: 42
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 8268
- 在线: 584.1小时
- 虫号: 1391607
- 注册: 2011-09-05
- 专业: 金属功能材料
5楼2012-10-30 10:01:28
982121012
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 1237 (讲师)
- 金币: 16291.4
- 散金: 581
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 8132
- 在线: 4523小时
- 虫号: 832958
- 注册: 2009-08-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境分析化学
2楼2012-10-30 09:03:09
3楼2012-10-30 09:12:36
yangleecool
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1698.3
- 散金: 2577
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 980
- 在线: 485.2小时
- 虫号: 914257
- 注册: 2009-11-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
4楼2012-10-30 09:58:37
10