| 查看: 2205 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
投稿Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers，接收后编辑部再次要求修改
|
|||
|
年初投稿，期间发回大修一次，修回后3个月直接接收，3天后编辑部再次发邮件要求修改，但是很多问题是大修时提过的，比如前言原来比较少，后来增加了部分内容，但是这次意见提示内容太多了，还有关于课题的创新性以及实验设计部分这个已经没法再改了，所以不知道怎么改了？难道是编辑部要反悔？好不容易中的一篇文章，请高人指点迷津，不胜感激啊！！ （该杂志是直接通过邮件投稿了，没有提交系统。中间有个小插曲，因为修回后一直没有发邮件提示已收到，但是投稿时3天后会回信收到，所以在中间曾2次发邮件提醒确认是否收到，理由是文件较大，担心邮件没有传送成功，这个按理不会让编辑部反感吧） 附上两次邮件 2012-10-16收到 BIOACTIVE AND COMPATIBLE POLYMERS Dear Dr. xx; Your manuscript entitled “xx” reports a simple modification on xx with little novelty. You need to emphasize how your work is enhancing our knowledge of this vigorous field. Currently, this and other necessary information is missing. The text is full of redundant and pointless information. For example, very basic unnecessary information can be seen in the introduction (1088 words). The design of the study has some technical problems and data lack necessary information. It requires the work of someone well versed in the field and English. Breif and direct presentation of new experimental facts are required. We are not able to process this manuscript for publication until these concerns are thoroughly addressed. The authors must recheck the manuscript as it does not seem that all of the remarks by the original reviewers have been appropriately addressed. Editor 2012-10-13收到 Dear Dr. xx; Your revised paper: xx has been received and is being scheduled for the February, 2013 Issue. An edited copy of your paper will be sent to you in about two months for your approval. We will then send it to the publisher and it will be posted on FIRST ONLINE after your paper has been proofed. It will then be followed by the printed publication as scheduled. Thank you for your contribution, Raphael Ottenbrite Editor |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有7人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有18人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有27人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
|
求大家帮忙再看看编辑部回复啥意思，我该怎么办啊？ 前两天根据大家的意见我向编辑部发了邮件询问，同时附上了前面的两份邮件，对方马上给我回信了，如下： Dear Dr. xx; We understand your confusion. Your paper was accepted for its scientific merit based on the reviewers comments. However, We do not think that you would be served well by publishing your paper in its current state. When the paper was passed on to the Journal editorial section they found that the presentation as described below would required extensive attention before it could be published and so ask that you bring your paper up tp standard or if you insist then you will be charged $35 an hour beyond our 2 hours of time allotted to bring a paper up to our publishable standards. 下面部分内容同原来邮件。 高人们看看这是啥意思？我看了后直觉就是怀疑是不是向我们要修改论文的费用啊？可是没表明具体要修改多少时间？我们课题组商量了下还是按他要求再修改下论文发过去，同时告诉他如果还不行请他修改，告诉我们大概需要多少钱，大家看这样行不行？有没有人遇到过这样的事情啊？ （貌似这个主编还是有知名度的，怎么会这样） |
8楼2012-10-21 21:47:08
2楼2012-10-18 19:14:00
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
3楼2012-10-18 20:22:13
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2012-10-18 20:27:55
20