| 查看: 1493 | 回复: 10 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者长征068将赠送您 3 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
投稿Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers，接收后编辑部再次要求修改
|
||
|
年初投稿，期间发回大修一次，修回后3个月直接接收，3天后编辑部再次发邮件要求修改，但是很多问题是大修时提过的，比如前言原来比较少，后来增加了部分内容，但是这次意见提示内容太多了，还有关于课题的创新性以及实验设计部分这个已经没法再改了，所以不知道怎么改了？难道是编辑部要反悔？好不容易中的一篇文章，请高人指点迷津，不胜感激啊！！ （该杂志是直接通过邮件投稿了，没有提交系统。中间有个小插曲，因为修回后一直没有发邮件提示已收到，但是投稿时3天后会回信收到，所以在中间曾2次发邮件提醒确认是否收到，理由是文件较大，担心邮件没有传送成功，这个按理不会让编辑部反感吧） 附上两次邮件 2012-10-16收到 BIOACTIVE AND COMPATIBLE POLYMERS Dear Dr. xx; Your manuscript entitled “xx” reports a simple modification on xx with little novelty. You need to emphasize how your work is enhancing our knowledge of this vigorous field. Currently, this and other necessary information is missing. The text is full of redundant and pointless information. For example, very basic unnecessary information can be seen in the introduction (1088 words). The design of the study has some technical problems and data lack necessary information. It requires the work of someone well versed in the field and English. Breif and direct presentation of new experimental facts are required. We are not able to process this manuscript for publication until these concerns are thoroughly addressed. The authors must recheck the manuscript as it does not seem that all of the remarks by the original reviewers have been appropriately addressed. Editor 2012-10-13收到 Dear Dr. xx; Your revised paper: xx has been received and is being scheduled for the February, 2013 Issue. An edited copy of your paper will be sent to you in about two months for your approval. We will then send it to the publisher and it will be posted on FIRST ONLINE after your paper has been proofed. It will then be followed by the printed publication as scheduled. Thank you for your contribution, Raphael Ottenbrite Editor |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
江南大学到瑞士招聘，称取消非升即走，改预聘+长聘
已经有28人回复
-
锌粉还原反应
已经有6人回复
-
青年和面上，哪个上会难度更大
已经有13人回复
-
复旦夏同学退学理由说明，哪儿可以下载？
已经有5人回复
-
有机反应
已经有6人回复
-
间氨基苯甲酸甲酯合成
已经有5人回复
-
有机化学迷茫学生
已经有10人回复
-
一名额难求啊
已经有10人回复
-
国自然资助比率是不是要下降了？？
已经有7人回复
-
水果保鲜投稿
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
2楼2012-10-18 19:14:00
7楼2012-10-19 21:25:58
|
求大家帮忙再看看编辑部回复啥意思，我该怎么办啊？ 前两天根据大家的意见我向编辑部发了邮件询问，同时附上了前面的两份邮件，对方马上给我回信了，如下： Dear Dr. xx; We understand your confusion. Your paper was accepted for its scientific merit based on the reviewers comments. However, We do not think that you would be served well by publishing your paper in its current state. When the paper was passed on to the Journal editorial section they found that the presentation as described below would required extensive attention before it could be published and so ask that you bring your paper up tp standard or if you insist then you will be charged $35 an hour beyond our 2 hours of time allotted to bring a paper up to our publishable standards. 下面部分内容同原来邮件。 高人们看看这是啥意思？我看了后直觉就是怀疑是不是向我们要修改论文的费用啊？可是没表明具体要修改多少时间？我们课题组商量了下还是按他要求再修改下论文发过去，同时告诉他如果还不行请他修改，告诉我们大概需要多少钱，大家看这样行不行？有没有人遇到过这样的事情啊？ （貌似这个主编还是有知名度的，怎么会这样） |
8楼2012-10-21 21:47:08
50