| 查看: 2069 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xintangren铜虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
来来来，大家看看，这个海外博后基金申请结果杯具了么，有必要去反驳吗？ 已有8人参与
|
||
|
Dear Sir or Madam, Concerning the 2012 Call for Individual Doctoral and Post-doctoral Grants, we inform you that all applications have been evaluated by panels of experts from the different scientific areas. The panels scored each application based on the merit of the applicant as well as the work programme presented and the hosting conditions. At this point, the evaluation process is completed and the following elements were considered: - the result of the evaluation of the application by the panel of experts; - the application of a threshold line for each scientific area. Based on these elements, we regret to inform that your application did not reach high enough priority to be recommended for funding. Following this evaluation result and according to the Portuguese law, you have the right to contest this decision and submit any comments that you find suitable, within the next ten working days. These comments must be submitted on line at the same web address where your evaluation report is available http://www.fct.mctes.pt/fctsig using the passwords assigned to you by FCT. Should you choose to submit any comments, FCT will inform you when a final decision has been made on your application. Sincerely Yours, Miguel Seabra President of FCT According to article 100 and following of the Código do Procedimento Administrativo you may submit observations that you consider pertinent no later than 10 work days after the initial publication in the context of audiencia prévia (preliminary hearing) and before results are considered final. Those observations, that may only concern procedural matters and eventual errors of an administrative nature, must be submitted online, using the same credentials used in the application process. Irrespective of your decision on submitting or not preliminary hearing observations a final decision about your application will be made which will be transmitted to you using email as soon as FCT considers all observations submitted. If the final decision confirms the refuse to award the grant, you may still file an appeal up to 15 working days after communication of the final decision. Only in the context of the appeal are arguments related to the scientific evaluation admissible. These are evaluated by a new evaluation panel nominated specifically for this effect. Consequently, arguments of a scientific or technical nature presented in the preliminary hearing will be ignored. Do you wish to record any comments during the preliminary hearing ? S (Yes) / N (No) [Your comment should be submitted and closed until 17:00 Lisbon Time, October 26 2012] 来来，大家看看，这个海外博后基金申请结果杯具了么，有必要去反驳吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有22人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大家看看这个评审意见[青年基金]
已经有10人回复
- 大家的博后基金都到账了吗？
已经有12人回复
- 博后基金未中复查排名-组内共13取前4我排第5，求大家指点
已经有22人回复
- 博后特助，大家都列参考文献了吗
已经有8人回复
- 博后科学基金申请中使用申请软件初始化失败，杯具，有碰到这种情况的吗？
已经有3人回复
- 大家都有支配博后基金的权利吗？
已经有25人回复
- 大家都有博后基金证书吗？
已经有13人回复
- 大家帮我看看这个青年基金意见是几A几B几C，有必要这次申请重新评审吗？
已经有12人回复
- 青基的结果，大家看看是几A、B、C啊！
已经有8人回复
- 大家帮忙看看去年我的函评结果
已经有22人回复
- 第50批博后面上基金申请，大家都准备好了么？进来交流下申请博后基金的经验吧！
已经有18人回复
- 大家认为博后基金专家推荐信的内容重要吗
已经有5人回复
- 去年收到邮件的时间发给大家看看
已经有31人回复
lulinsmann
木虫 (著名写手)
三无小小鸟
- 应助: 90 (初中生)
- 金币: 10459.2
- 散金: 125
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2465
- 在线: 693.4小时
- 虫号: 386161
- 注册: 2007-05-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学和光电子材料
11楼2012-10-15 14:31:20