应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » Plos One 杂志投稿问题
52/1返回列表
查看: 3234  |  回复: 12
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

huguangdong

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] Plos One 杂志投稿问题

PLOS ONE这个杂志如果第一次因为语言和图片处理的原因拒稿，然后通过修改语言和图片质量能不能重新投该杂志，编辑对于本论文的内容还是肯定的？大家谁有这方面的经验不吝赐教？急等啊！以下是编辑回复：
PONE-D-12-28282
Characteristics of a newly immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line
PLOS ONE

Dear Mrs Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected.

Specifically, the writing style and the figure quality does not meet our publication criteria. The reviewer and editor had difficulty to verify the data discussed in your manuscript. The study on an immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line has its merit. I encourage you to significantly improve your manuscript and submit it as a new paper.

I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,

Jun Sun, Ph.D.
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: The authors tried to present data on the generation and characterization of an immortalized swine small intestinal epithelial cell line. However, the English used in this manuscript is very poor and barely intelligible, with numerous errors in grammar and style throughout. The figures (too many) are of poor quality and there are no numbers or titles on the figures to identify them. To make it worse, when figures are referred to in the text, the figures were not numbered by the sequence they appear. Therefore, there is no way to match them. The authors should seek professional editorial help before submitting the manuscript to any journal. Because PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. This reviewer will reject this paper because it does not meet the basic journal standards.



[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be accessible only via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

- - - - -
For journal use only: PONEDEC3
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2012-10-13 09:00:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wulishi8

专家顾问 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

完全可以重投，但是一定要保证已经解决了语言和论文中的问题，而且看起来问题还比较严重。Plos one不难的，好好写论文才是关键。
赞一下 回复此楼
中山大学材料学院招聘博士后和专职研究员，年薪20万起，请站内联系，谢谢。
12楼2012-10-21 04:22:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答

youyouyanr

铁虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
这个不好说，看见审稿人的意见，我感觉他对你的算法好像没做太大评论，只是说你的文章 语言  格式。。。都不合格，以我的看法，你的论文好像 审稿人没怎么看，只是因为论文 不易读，太乱，给退了

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
认真交流
2楼2012-10-13 10:33:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

glassman782

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
主要是修改语言，评价有一点正面的信息，但还不能据此推断能不能发表
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-10-13 10:39:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chunlong0377

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
以我看来，可以再投，审稿人主要说语言和图片问题，在你投稿时，图片说明那部分需要有相应的图片说明，比如你图片是figure1，说明那一栏一定也要填上figure1,否则审稿人就说不能identify。另外，修改语言和图片质量，语言找专家改改，图片用prism作图，像素300dpi。投稿plosone，语言问题太大都是可以据稿的，因为该杂志收稿量太大。in fact,我已经悲剧2次了，语言不行和缺乏创新。还是改改继续投吧，把小毛病都解决了，编辑和审稿人才会更深入考虑文章的情况。加油，努力就走希望。plos one也没啥，关键是文章要好，祝福。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
NCS
4楼2012-10-13 10:55:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 13 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭