| 查看: 840 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhangjiandapao银虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大侠们，帮我看下审稿意见，需要重选期刊投稿么？ 已有6人参与
|
||
|
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/jmad/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, Kevin Edwards Editor in Chief Materials and Design Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: strenth should be corrected as strength in Highlights 1 and 2. In experimental section it was said that hardness tests were performed. There is not any results of hardness tests in the manuscript. The changes in the strength, elongation and fracture toughness with addition of Mn or Zr should be explained in detail. The explanation should include microstructural point of view. Reviewer #2: Better the conclusion be one single paragraph ony. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有10人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求教各位大侠，以下期刊的审稿周期大概多长时间以及版面费问题
已经有5人回复
- 论文被拒后根据审稿人的意见修改后重新投该期刊的问题
已经有16人回复
- 怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见，有没有模板啊？
已经有4人回复
- 材料工程 期刊 收到录用通知 还用严格按审稿意见修改论文嘛
已经有12人回复
- 咨询下投化工环保期刊要审稿费吗？
已经有3人回复
- 请问wiley旗下的期刊一般审稿几轮？
已经有12人回复
- SCI期刊会采用我推荐的审稿人吗？
已经有13人回复
- ACS中具体的某一期刊如何看审稿状态？
已经有8人回复
- 一审稿人建议我投别的期刊，怎么回信啊？
已经有12人回复
- 国内EI期刊，文章被退稿，审稿意见说可以修改后重投，成功率大吗，值得吗？
已经有17人回复
- 大家都知道国内哪些数学类期刊不需要付审稿费和版面费啊
已经有5人回复
- 大家说说不需要审稿费的【机械工程类】核心期刊? 比较容易接受的？
已经有20人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
zjwang1980
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 146 (高中生)
- 金币: 1833.7
- 散金: 378
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 833
- 在线: 292.4小时
- 虫号: 1053565
- 注册: 2010-07-07
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
3楼2012-10-12 17:30:51
zjwang1980
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 146 (高中生)
- 金币: 1833.7
- 散金: 378
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 833
- 在线: 292.4小时
- 虫号: 1053565
- 注册: 2010-07-07
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
2楼2012-10-12 17:30:15
glassman782
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1519 (讲师)
- 金币: 13340.3
- 红花: 29
- 帖子: 7313
- 在线: 513.9小时
- 虫号: 468843
- 注册: 2007-11-28
- 专业: 粉末冶金与粉体工程
4楼2012-10-12 17:34:43
qdykswang
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 14 (小学生)
- 金币: 6371.1
- 散金: 43
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 1189
- 在线: 309.8小时
- 虫号: 1382019
- 注册: 2011-08-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 数值预报与数值模拟
5楼2012-10-12 17:40:07