| 查看: 2428 | 回复: 13 | |||||
Dean_Amy实习版主
|
[求助]
修稿意见怎么回？
|
||||
| 第一次投文章，收到修稿意见是moderate revision has been requested，但是具体的怎么写毫无头绪，又没有大侠有回复经验的，分享你们的回信word，我学习学习~无头绪啊 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 百宝箱 | 关于写作 |
» 猜你喜欢
342求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料与化工调剂一志愿大连海事085600，349
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿武理材料工程302调剂环化或化工
已经有16人回复
-
311求调剂一志愿合肥工业大学
已经有12人回复
-
环境工程调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288求调剂 一志愿哈工大 材料与化工
已经有22人回复
-
085600，321分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿 南京航空航天大学 ，080500材料科学与工程学硕
已经有11人回复
-
土木304求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 太阳能学报退修（1个审稿意见，1星期内返回）是什么意思？
已经有16人回复
- 修回的意见有一条看不太明白，请教大家，无线通信方向
已经有7人回复
- 初审意见两个审稿人，一个强调创新性不强，一个要求大修. 该 怎样回复啊？ 谢谢
已经有39人回复
- 修改意见回来了，接下来该怎么办？
已经有5人回复
- 小修没有完全回答审稿人意见，会不会悲剧啊？
已经有21人回复
- 论文修回后编辑给出如下意见，有些看不懂什么意思，指高人指点
已经有25人回复
- 求助啊，SCI修稿后一月有余，询问编辑，给了一封回信，大家帮忙看一下是什么意思啊
已经有24人回复
- Journal of Vibration and Control修回意见
已经有8人回复
- 论文大修意见感觉比较难回复，打算放弃，然后还想在同一杂志上投另一篇文章，可以吗
已经有9人回复
- 这个修回意见是什么意思呢?急!
已经有11人回复
- 文章大修，面目全非，怎么回修改意见？
已经有10人回复
liuzhishfd
专家顾问
- 应助: 82 (初中生)
- 金币: 5120.6
- 散金: 203
- 红花: 34
- 帖子: 2335
- 在线: 153.6小时
- 虫号: 1518267
- 注册: 2011-12-01
- 专业: 控制理论与方法
8楼2012-10-08 17:04:16
liruihyd
兑换贵宾
- 应助: 230 (大学生)
- 金币: 3390.9
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1812
- 在线: 344.7小时
- 虫号: 839756
- 注册: 2009-09-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子物理与高分子物理化
2楼2012-10-08 11:56:29
jw4020 
兑换贵宾
- 应助: 21 (小学生)
- 金币: 120.2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 163
- 在线: 11.4小时
- 虫号: 2032715
- 注册: 2012-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药药性理论
3楼2012-10-08 12:11:27
Dean_Amy
管理员
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1088.4
- 散金: 63
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 359
- 在线: 40.7小时
- 虫号: 1177972
- 注册: 2010-12-26
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶
4楼2012-10-08 15:15:20
Dean_Amy
超级版主
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1088.4
- 散金: 63
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 359
- 在线: 40.7小时
- 虫号: 1177972
- 注册: 2010-12-26
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属非晶态、准晶和纳米晶
5楼2012-10-08 15:15:32
zhandy
主管区长
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 976.7
- 散金: 77
- 帖子: 417
- 在线: 261.9小时
- 虫号: 495351
- 注册: 2008-01-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
6楼2012-10-08 15:43:11
wumin1283
超级版主
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 金币: 946.5
- 散金: 899
- 帖子: 1942
- 在线: 60.7小时
- 虫号: 887726
- 注册: 2009-10-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 食品加工学基础
7楼2012-10-08 16:55:49
nono2009
禁虫
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:22:49
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:22:49
9楼2012-10-08 18:09:33
c25968
专家顾问
- 应助: 73 (初中生)
- 金币: 4166.7
- 散金: 2569
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 1864
- 在线: 137.6小时
- 虫号: 684566
- 注册: 2008-12-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 资源利用科学及其他
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+6, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:21:56
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+6, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:21:56
|
Dear Editor and reviewer: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewer’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Anisotropic surface energies and adsorption behaviors of scheelite crystal” (COLSUA-D-12-00690). Those comments are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have studied the comments carefully and made corrections accordingly which we hope meet with approval. Revised parts are marked in red in the paper. Here below is our description on corresponding revisions according to the reviewer’s comments. 1. The reviewer’s comment: General & Supplementary Material: The idea to obtain an optimized structure with DFT and then to evaluate the "dynamics" around this minimum with MD is good. However, the local structure of the molecules might differ between the two methods. I would recommend the authors to minimize the final structures obtained with MD back with DFT and discuss briefly the possible discrepancies (if any). This could be performed just if computational time is not an issue, but in any case it would be 'fair' to state it somewhere (I do not expect large differences in the structure). The authors’ Answer: The reviewer’s idea is valuable. However, frankly speaking, the minimizations of the final structures obtained with MD back with DFT require a large amount of computer time since the scheelite/adsorbate system we build has about 400 atoms while the DFT calculations usually perform the system with less than 100 atoms. Therefore, we do not perform the minimization of scheelite/adsorbate system using DFT. But we make a comparison between our results and those reported by Cooper and de Leeuw [9]. They studied the interaction between methanoic acid as a model for a range of longer chain carboxylic acids (such as oleic acid) and (001) scheelite surface by atomistic simulations. The results showed that methanoic aicd interacted with the scheelite surface by attaching by their carbonyl oxygen atom to surface calcium ion at distances ranging from 2.3 to 2.6 Å, while coordinating by its hydrogen atom of hydroxyl group to a surface oxygen atom at 2.6 Å. Our simulation obtained the most stable configuration with a distance of 2.992 Å between carbonyl oxygen atom of oleate and surface calcium ions. It may be tenable to infer that, compared to methanoic acid, the geometric and steric factors of long carbon chain of oleate and the electrostatic repulsion between oxygen ion of oleate and that on the scheelite surface may lead to a slightly larger distance between carbonyl oxygen atom of oleate and surface calcium ions. In addition, we chose UFF to simulate shceelite/adsorbate systems and perform a configuration search since the implementation of UFF in MS Modeling was rigorously tested and the results were in good agreement with previous publications, indicating that UFF was moderately accurate for predicting geometries and conformational energy differences of organic molecules, inorganic and metal complexes. The earlier work by Pradip and Rai demonstrated that UFF could be used to simulate calcium bearing mineral – adsorate systems with reasonable accuracy. The above discussion has already appeared in the section “Geometry optimization of scheelite surface – surfactant complex” in page 8. 2. The reviewer’s comment: typo: page 3 first line: «.,» ==> «.» The authors’ Answer: Corrected accordingly. 3. The reviewer’s comment: page 5, Kai et al. Here citing the supplementary material to show the structure (Tab 1 of supplementary) could be useful to allow the reproducibility of the results. The authors’ Answer: As suggested, the statement of “see Table 1 of the supplementary material available with this article online” was added after Kai et al in page 5. |
10楼2012-10-08 18:51:02
