24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2227  |  回复: 13

Dean_Amy

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 修稿意见怎么回?

第一次投文章,收到修稿意见是moderate revision has been requested,但是具体的怎么写毫无头绪,又没有大侠有回复经验的,分享你们的回信word,我学习学习~无头绪啊
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

百宝箱 关于写作

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

keepmoving
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

liuzhishfd

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
只要根据每个审稿人的意见回复就可以了,确实不太需要什么格式。我的两篇文章审稿人基本都没什么意见,直接通过呢,也没怎么写回复。

就像上面虫友们说的,要逐条回复,哪一行怎么变动的要交代清楚,当然了不能给人感觉像是你改动了很多东西,像后来你发现的小语法小标点错误直接改过来就行了,不需要再特别交待了
8楼2012-10-08 17:04:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

liruihyd

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
小修还好的。
1. 按照审稿人的意见,逐一回复。
2. 在修改稿对应处标出修改内容。
2楼2012-10-08 11:56:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jw4020

新虫 (小有名气)


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
自己不会看或者不知道怎么办,可请专门人士识别并操作。
3楼2012-10-08 12:11:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Dean_Amy

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by liruihyd at 2012-10-08 11:56:29
小修还好的。
1. 按照审稿人的意见,逐一回复。
2. 在修改稿对应处标出修改内容。

谢谢,我就想有个范本看看,这样更容易下手
keepmoving
4楼2012-10-08 15:15:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Dean_Amy

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by jw4020 at 2012-10-08 12:11:27
自己不会看或者不知道怎么办,可请专门人士识别并操作。

这个还是想自己学习
keepmoving
5楼2012-10-08 15:15:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhandy

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+1 2012-10-09 18:23:05
祝贺,按要求逐条修改就是了,不必过于拘于格式
6楼2012-10-08 15:43:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wumin1283

银虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+1 2012-10-09 18:22:59
格式不重要,也没有特别要求, 只要逐条回答和修改审稿意见即可,标注清楚论文的相应位置,说话客气和谦虚点,祝好运!
7楼2012-10-08 16:55:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:22:49
9楼2012-10-08 18:09:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

c25968

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Dean_Amy: 金币+6, ★★★很有帮助 2012-10-09 18:21:56
Dear Editor and reviewer:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewer’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Anisotropic surface energies and adsorption behaviors of scheelite crystal” (COLSUA-D-12-00690). Those comments are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have studied the comments carefully and made corrections accordingly which we hope meet with approval. Revised parts are marked in red in the paper. Here below is our description on corresponding revisions according to the reviewer’s comments.
1. The reviewer’s comment:
General & Supplementary Material:
   The idea to obtain an optimized structure with DFT and then to evaluate the "dynamics" around this minimum with MD is good.
   However, the local structure of the molecules might differ between the two methods.
   I would recommend the authors to minimize the final structures obtained with MD back with DFT and discuss briefly the possible discrepancies (if any). This could be performed just if computational time is not an issue, but in any case it would be 'fair' to state it somewhere (I do not expect large differences in the structure).

The authors’ Answer:
The reviewer’s idea is valuable. However, frankly speaking, the minimizations of the final structures obtained with MD back with DFT require a large amount of computer time since the scheelite/adsorbate system we build has about 400 atoms while the DFT calculations usually perform the system with less than 100 atoms. Therefore, we do not perform the minimization of scheelite/adsorbate system using DFT.
But we make a comparison between our results and those reported by Cooper and de Leeuw [9]. They studied the interaction between methanoic acid as a model for a range of longer chain carboxylic acids (such as oleic acid) and (001) scheelite surface by atomistic simulations. The results showed that methanoic aicd interacted with the scheelite surface by attaching by their carbonyl oxygen atom to surface calcium ion at distances ranging from 2.3 to 2.6 Å, while coordinating by its hydrogen atom of hydroxyl group to a surface oxygen atom at 2.6 Å. Our simulation obtained the most stable configuration with a distance of 2.992 Å between carbonyl oxygen atom of oleate and surface calcium ions. It may be tenable to infer that, compared to methanoic acid, the geometric and steric factors of long carbon chain of oleate and the electrostatic repulsion between oxygen ion of oleate and that on the scheelite surface may lead to a slightly larger distance between carbonyl oxygen atom of oleate and surface calcium ions.
In addition, we chose UFF to simulate shceelite/adsorbate systems and perform a configuration search since the implementation of UFF in MS Modeling was rigorously tested and the results were in good agreement with previous publications, indicating that UFF was moderately accurate for predicting geometries and conformational energy differences of organic molecules, inorganic and metal complexes. The earlier work by Pradip and Rai demonstrated that UFF could be used to simulate calcium bearing mineral – adsorate systems with reasonable accuracy. The above discussion has already appeared in the section “Geometry optimization of scheelite surface – surfactant complex” in page 8.

2. The reviewer’s comment:
typo: page 3 first line: «.,» ==> «.»

The authors’ Answer:
Corrected accordingly.

3. The reviewer’s comment:
page 5, Kai et al.
   Here citing the supplementary material to show the structure (Tab 1 of supplementary) could be useful to allow the reproducibility of the results.

The authors’ Answer:
As suggested, the statement of “see Table 1 of the supplementary material available with this article online” was added after Kai et al in page 5.
10楼2012-10-08 18:51:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Dean_Amy 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见