24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1714  |  回复: 18
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

liukang198

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

自定义头衔

[求助] 这样的意见我该怎么办?谁跟我说说!

这样的意见我该怎么办?修回中的几率大吗?
Comments to the Author
(1)
As suggested by Referee 1, "the authors should discuss the observed results further by comparing with established imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and by commenting potential advantages of the reported two-tail versions". The revised manuscript involves mostly format modification. To address the above comment, the authors revised the conclusion that "We found that these surfactants were more surface active than Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants[15], However, this conclusion still need further experiment research to prove and we will pay more attention to the latest progress in this field". Such statement is inappropriate; if experiments need to be done, then do it and show the data.

(2)
As suggested by reviewer 1, the authors should discuss the observed results further by comparing with established imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and by commenting potential advantages of the reported two-tail versions. However, the authors respond only in the conclusion section that they found the established two-tail surfactants had higher surface activity than Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants (See ref.15). The authors did not give out further experimental evidences about why the special structures of those ionic liquid surfactants have significant impact on their surface activity. In addition, no corresponding discusses on the influences from the configuration changes of those imidazolium ionic liquid surfactant molecules in micellization processes on the enthalpy-entropy compensation phenomenon.
The reviewer 2 suggested the authors should include in the introduction and conclusion section a clear scientific justification how the works contribute to new fundamental understanding in the specific area of research. However, the authors does not respond that requirements appropriately. In my opinion, it is definitely important for the audients to understand the originality of the present works.
In experimental section 2.3, about the determining the solution surface tension by drop volume method, please give out the detailed instructions on the experimental equipments, and the corresponding parameters and procedures for measurement of the surface tensions. As such, the audients can test the accuracy of the experimental data and whether the conclusions are acceptable.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

十八康
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+1, 有帮助 2012-09-23 18:43:37
既然没有拒你,还提出了很详细的意见,那就根据其进行修改吧。
5楼2012-09-23 11:09:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

buchwald

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+2, 有帮助, 谢谢! 2012-09-23 18:42:56
逐条回复,并尽可能做好相应的修改,比如第一个审稿人后面的“Such statement is inappropriate; if experiments need to be done, then do it and show the data. ”
将这些文字表述修改准确些。
审稿人提出的补做实验也要尽可能做好
2楼2012-09-23 10:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuhaiying918

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+5, 有帮助, 慢慢来吧!哎~ 2012-09-23 18:43:14
xj850626: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-10-01 18:50:20
1.审稿人让你把自己的算法和现有最新的最权威的算法进行比较。(貌似已经给你指出和哪个对比了)
2.你的论文的格式需要修改。(个人建议你用的期刊提供的模版)
3.需要提供更多的实验室数据,并详细说明。
4.你的intruduction和conclusion应该重新进行调整。
5.你的实验部分,尽量飞出具体过程以及实验中应用的参数。

好好按照这个意见修改,逐条提供修改的说明。祝福楼主好运!
3楼2012-09-23 10:53:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+1, 有帮助 2012-09-23 18:43:27
是的, 同意楼上的众意见.....
只有根据 reviewer 的意见, 一一去改...
然后再提交争取 acceptance
祝楼主好运~
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
4楼2012-09-23 10:56:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见