24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2049  |  回复: 18
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

liukang198

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

自定义头衔

[求助] 这样的意见我该怎么办?谁跟我说说!

这样的意见我该怎么办?修回中的几率大吗?
Comments to the Author
(1)
As suggested by Referee 1, "the authors should discuss the observed results further by comparing with established imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and by commenting potential advantages of the reported two-tail versions". The revised manuscript involves mostly format modification. To address the above comment, the authors revised the conclusion that "We found that these surfactants were more surface active than Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants[15], However, this conclusion still need further experiment research to prove and we will pay more attention to the latest progress in this field". Such statement is inappropriate; if experiments need to be done, then do it and show the data.

(2)
As suggested by reviewer 1, the authors should discuss the observed results further by comparing with established imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants and by commenting potential advantages of the reported two-tail versions. However, the authors respond only in the conclusion section that they found the established two-tail surfactants had higher surface activity than Gemini imidazolium ionic liquid surfactants (See ref.15). The authors did not give out further experimental evidences about why the special structures of those ionic liquid surfactants have significant impact on their surface activity. In addition, no corresponding discusses on the influences from the configuration changes of those imidazolium ionic liquid surfactant molecules in micellization processes on the enthalpy-entropy compensation phenomenon.
The reviewer 2 suggested the authors should include in the introduction and conclusion section a clear scientific justification how the works contribute to new fundamental understanding in the specific area of research. However, the authors does not respond that requirements appropriately. In my opinion, it is definitely important for the audients to understand the originality of the present works.
In experimental section 2.3, about the determining the solution surface tension by drop volume method, please give out the detailed instructions on the experimental equipments, and the corresponding parameters and procedures for measurement of the surface tensions. As such, the audients can test the accuracy of the experimental data and whether the conclusions are acceptable.
回复此楼
十八康
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wumin1283

银虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


liukang198: 金币+1, 有帮助, 谢谢 2012-09-30 07:29:20
不管什么意见,只要认真修改,还是很有希望的,祝福啦!
12楼2012-09-29 16:18:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

buchwald

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+2, 有帮助, 谢谢! 2012-09-23 18:42:56
逐条回复,并尽可能做好相应的修改,比如第一个审稿人后面的“Such statement is inappropriate; if experiments need to be done, then do it and show the data. ”
将这些文字表述修改准确些。
审稿人提出的补做实验也要尽可能做好
2楼2012-09-23 10:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuhaiying918

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+5, 有帮助, 慢慢来吧!哎~ 2012-09-23 18:43:14
xj850626: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2012-10-01 18:50:20
1.审稿人让你把自己的算法和现有最新的最权威的算法进行比较。(貌似已经给你指出和哪个对比了)
2.你的论文的格式需要修改。(个人建议你用的期刊提供的模版)
3.需要提供更多的实验室数据,并详细说明。
4.你的intruduction和conclusion应该重新进行调整。
5.你的实验部分,尽量飞出具体过程以及实验中应用的参数。

好好按照这个意见修改,逐条提供修改的说明。祝福楼主好运!
3楼2012-09-23 10:53:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

rockinuk

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liukang198: 金币+1, 有帮助 2012-09-23 18:43:27
是的, 同意楼上的众意见.....
只有根据 reviewer 的意见, 一一去改...
然后再提交争取 acceptance
祝楼主好运~
我的爱徒~再撑一下~你快拿到清华全校优秀硕士论文了~
4楼2012-09-23 10:56:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +5 zju2000 2026-08-16 5/250 2026-08-16 23:23 by Haru815
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +32 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 74/3700 2026-08-16 21:05 by 医学老男孩
[论文投稿] 岩土工程学报什么时候才能终审完呐 25+3 yeager111 2026-08-10 4/200 2026-08-16 20:42 by tfang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +13 archvillain 2026-08-15 25/1250 2026-08-16 20:13 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +3 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 6/300 2026-08-16 20:07 by 奶牛小黑
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +9 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 9/450 2026-08-16 13:24 by wukun_007
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 26/1300 2026-08-16 12:35 by 启萌科技
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +10 majunge000 2026-08-11 12/600 2026-08-16 08:18 by xli1984
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +12 Tide man 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-15 16:34 by 氺木
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-14 14:58 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +10 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 32/1600 2026-08-14 09:37 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
信息提示
请填处理意见