|
|
[½»Á÷]
pending decision
ÎÄÕÂ8.17ÒªÇóminor revision
8.30ºÅÐÞ»Ø
µÚ¶þÌì under review
9.7 pending decision
ÏÖÔÚ¶¼Ò»ÖÜÁË»¹ÊÇpending decision.½¹Âǰ¡¡£µÈ×űÏÒµ¡£²»»á±¯¾çÁ˰ɡ£¡£¡£¡£¡£
µÚÒ»´ÎͶӢÎÄÎÄÕ£¬¸Ð¾õÐÄÀíûµ×£¬²»ÖªµÀ»Ø´ðºÃÎÊÌâºÍÐÞ¸ÄÎÄÕµıê×¼ÔÚÄÄÀ¸Ð¾õûÓлشðºÃ£¬ÐÞ¸ÄҲûÓÐÐ޸ĺá£
Èç¹ûÄܽÓÊÕ£¬É¢Íê½ð±Ò£¬ÇóÈËÆ·¡£¡£¡£¡£
½ñÌì¶¼10ÔÂ6ºÅÁË£¬pending decision ÒѾ1¸öÔÂÁË¡£ÇëÎʿɲ»¿ÉÒÔ¸ø±à¼Ð´ÐÅѯÎÊһϣ¿Èç¹û¿ÉÒÔ£¬ÈçºÎд±È½ÏºÃ£¿ÄÜ·ñ¸ø¸öÄ£°å£¿
½ñÌìÖÕÓÚÓÐÏûÏ¢ÁË£¬ÊÇ»¹ÊÇminor revision¡£Á½¸öÒªÇó£¬Ò»¸öÊÇI would appreciate if you could provide a citation for the psychometric properties (reliability, validity) of the**** scale. ÁíÒ»¸öÊÇThe authors were very responsive to reviewer suggestions and the manuscript is much-improved as a result. My only comment is that the language is still off in several places throughout the manuscript. A quick review/revision by a native English speaker would quickly address this issue.
ÇëÎʸ÷λÓÐûÓкÃÒ»µãµÄnative English speaker°ïÖúÈóÉ«ÓïÑÔ°¡£¿½»Ç®µÄÒ²¿ÉÒÔ£¿ÕâÆªÎÄÕ¶ÔÎÒºÜÖØÒª£¬ËùÒÔÏëÕÒÎÈÍס¢¸ºÔðµÄÄÇÖÖ¡£
[ Last edited by fmmmiao on 2012-10-7 at 09:38 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÌåÖÆÄÚ³¤±²ËµÌåÖÆÄÚ¾ø´ó²¿·ÖÒ»±²×ÓÔڵײ㣬ÈçͬÄãÃÇÒ»Ñù´ó²¿·ÖÆÕͨ½ÌʦæÇÒÊÕÈëµÍ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ΪʲôÖйú´óѧ¹¤¿Æ½ÌÊÚÃÇË®ÁËÄÇô¶àËùνµÄ¶¥»á¶¥¿¯£¬µ«»¹ÊÇ×ö²»³öÓîÊ÷»úÆ÷ÈË£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
²é¿´È«²¿É¢½ðÌù
|