|
|
[交流]
请大家分析据稿原因，说文章“technically sound”，还“Reject”
最近投了Polymer-Plastic Technology and Engineering,给点据稿意见如下
Dear Dr. xxxxxx:
Thank you very much for submitting your article for publication consideration. We very much regret to inform you that we will unable to consider it further. This is NOT a reflection on the quality of the article. No doubt the article is technically sound. We wish we could publish all the articles that we receive unfortunately, we cannot at this time.
Thank you for considering Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.
Sincerely,
Dr. Munmaya MISHRA
Editor in Chief, Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering
唉，既然技术上“sound”，还给个“reject”，连个意见都木得，内容和期刊应该相符啊，因为在上面见过内容相关的文章才往上面投的，让人摸不清头脑，请大家给些意见，该如何处理啊
 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|
回复此楼
+1/96
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
+3